Overall
- Kingston
- 100.7
Diff +2.5 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Kingston is 2.5% more expensive than Prescott Valley-Prescott.
Kingston, NY is 2.5% more expensive than Prescott Valley-Prescott, AZ on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 100.7 vs 98.3). A $100,000 salary in Prescott Valley-Prescott buys about the same as $102,498 in Kingston; the largest component gap is services.
RPP parity plate
Pair AZ:NY 98.3→100.7
TIER-NEAR · CROSS-STATE · SERVICES-LED · BENCH-CROSS · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Kingston, NY is 2.5% more expensive than Prescott Valley-Prescott, AZ, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 2.5-point overall gap.
This route crosses the national benchmark: Kingston is above 100 while Prescott Valley-Prescott is below it. That makes the move a change of price regime, not merely a rank swap.
Services leads the difference, with Kingston 42.1 points higher than Prescott Valley-Prescott. Goods, services, and rents all point in the same broad direction, making the headline comparison more transferable across household types.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Prescott Valley-Prescott to $102,498 in Kingston, but it is not a personal spending weight.
Prescott Valley-Prescott and Kingston share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 4.1 to 2.5 RPP points. Kingston remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Rents changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 17.5 points between the first and latest shared releases (28.9 to 11.4 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Prescott Valley-Prescott RPP | Kingston RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 103.0 | 107.1 | 4.1 points Kingston higher |
| 2012 | 96.5 | 102.0 | 5.5 points Kingston higher |
| 2016 | 98.6 | 101.2 | 2.6 points Kingston higher |
| 2020 | 93.2 | 101.6 | 8.4 points Kingston higher |
| 2024 | 98.3 | 100.7 | 2.5 points Kingston higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
Diff +2.5 RPP
Diff +3.5 RPP
Diff +42.1 RPP
Diff +11.4 RPP
| Category | Prescott Valley-Prescott | Kingston | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 98.3 | 100.7 | +2.5 |
| Goods | 96.2 | 99.7 | +3.5 |
| Services | 91.5 | 133.6 | +42.1 |
| Rents | 98.8 | 110.2 | +11.4 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
What a salary in Prescott Valley-Prescott would need to be in Kingston for the same purchasing power:
| In Prescott Valley-Prescott | In Kingston | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $51,249 | +$1,249 |
| $75,000 | $76,873 | +$1,873 |
| $100,000 | $102,498 | +$2,498 |
| $150,000 | $153,746 | +$3,746 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (98.3 → 100.7), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Kingston is 2.5% more expensive than Prescott Valley-Prescott. The overall cost index is 100.7 vs 98.3 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Prescott Valley-Prescott has the same purchasing power as $102,498 in Kingston. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Prescott Valley-Prescott are indexed at 98.8 while Kingston is at 110.2 (national average = 100). Kingston has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.