Overall
- Casper
- 93.8
Diff -4.4 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Casper is 4.5% less expensive than Prescott Valley-Prescott.
Casper, WY is 4.5% less expensive than Prescott Valley-Prescott, AZ on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 93.8 vs 98.3). A $100,000 salary in Prescott Valley-Prescott buys about the same as $95,495 in Casper; the largest component gap is rents.
RPP parity plate
Pair AZ:WY 98.3→93.8
TIER-NEAR · CROSS-STATE · RENT-LED · BOTH-BELOW · PP-SHIFT
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
What a salary in Prescott Valley-Prescott would need to be in Casper for the same purchasing power:
| In Prescott Valley-Prescott | In Casper | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $47,748 | $-2,252 |
| $75,000 | $71,622 | $-3,378 |
| $100,000 | $95,495 | $-4,505 |
| $150,000 | $143,243 | $-6,757 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (98.3 → 93.8), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
Casper, WY is 4.5% less expensive than Prescott Valley-Prescott, AZ, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 4.4-point overall gap.
Rents leads the difference, with Casper 24.6 points lower than Prescott Valley-Prescott. Goods, services, and rents all point in the same broad direction, making the headline comparison more transferable across household types.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Prescott Valley-Prescott corresponds to $95,495 in Casper.
Diff -4.4 RPP
Diff -0.9 RPP
Diff -12.6 RPP
Diff -24.6 RPP
| Category | Prescott Valley-Prescott | Casper | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 98.3 | 93.8 | -4.4 |
| Goods | 96.2 | 95.4 | -0.9 |
| Services | 91.5 | 78.9 | -12.6 |
| Rents | 98.8 | 74.2 | -24.6 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Prescott Valley-Prescott and Casper share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 10.7 to 4.4 RPP points. Prescott Valley-Prescott remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Rents changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 16.0 points between the first and latest shared releases (40.6 to 24.6 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Prescott Valley-Prescott RPP | Casper RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 103.0 | 92.3 | 10.7 points Prescott Valley-Prescott higher |
| 2012 | 96.5 | 99.2 | 2.7 points Casper higher |
| 2016 | 98.6 | 97.6 | 1.0 points Prescott Valley-Prescott higher |
| 2020 | 93.2 | 93.3 | 0.1 points Casper higher |
| 2024 | 98.3 | 93.8 | 4.4 points Prescott Valley-Prescott higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
Casper is 4.5% less expensive than Prescott Valley-Prescott. The overall cost index is 93.8 vs 98.3 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Prescott Valley-Prescott has the same purchasing power as $95,495 in Casper. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Prescott Valley-Prescott are indexed at 98.8 while Casper is at 74.2 (national average = 100). Prescott Valley-Prescott has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.