Overall
Diff +2.7 RPP
Prescott Valley-Prescott vs Burlington-South Burlington
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Burlington-South Burlington is 2.7% more expensive than Prescott Valley-Prescott.
2.7% more expensive
Burlington-South Burlington, VT is 2.7% more expensive than Prescott Valley-Prescott, AZ on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 100.9 vs 98.3). A $100,000 salary in Prescott Valley-Prescott buys about the same as $102,742 in Burlington-South Burlington; the largest component gap is services.
- Overall RPP 98.3 (Prescott Valley-Prescott) vs 100.9 (Burlington-South Burlington)
- $100k in Prescott Valley-Prescott ≈ $102,742 purchasing power in Burlington-South Burlington
- Services drives the gap (+34.1 RPP points)
RPP parity plate
Pair AZ:VT 98.3→100.9
TIER-NEAR · CROSS-STATE · SERVICES-LED · BENCH-CROSS · PP-SHIFT
- TIER-NEAR Near tier
- CROSS-STATE AZ × VT
- SERVICES-LED Services-led gap
- BENCH-CROSS Benchmark cross
- PP-SHIFT PP shift
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
What This Comparison Actually Tells You
Burlington-South Burlington, VT is 2.7% more expensive than Prescott Valley-Prescott, AZ, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 2.7-point overall gap.
This route crosses the national benchmark: Burlington-South Burlington is above 100 while Prescott Valley-Prescott is below it. That makes the move a change of price regime, not merely a rank swap.
Services leads the difference, with Burlington-South Burlington 34.1 points higher than Prescott Valley-Prescott. Goods, services, and rents all point in the same broad direction, making the headline comparison more transferable across household types.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Prescott Valley-Prescott to $102,742 in Burlington-South Burlington, but it is not a personal spending weight.
How the Price Gap Changed
Prescott Valley-Prescott and Burlington-South Burlington share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap widened, moving from 0.1 to 2.7 RPP points. Burlington-South Burlington remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Services changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 8.0 points between the first and latest shared releases (42.0 to 34.1 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Prescott Valley-Prescott RPP | Burlington-South Burlington RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 103.0 | 103.1 | 0.1 points Burlington-South Burlington higher |
| 2012 | 96.5 | 102.7 | 6.2 points Burlington-South Burlington higher |
| 2016 | 98.6 | 102.1 | 3.5 points Burlington-South Burlington higher |
| 2020 | 93.2 | 105.1 | 11.9 points Burlington-South Burlington higher |
| 2024 | 98.3 | 100.9 | 2.7 points Burlington-South Burlington higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
Category Breakdown
Goods
Diff +1.0 RPP
Services
Diff +34.1 RPP
Rents
Diff +5.1 RPP
| Category | Prescott Valley-Prescott | Burlington-South Burlington | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 98.3 | 100.9 | +2.7 |
| Goods | 96.2 | 97.3 | +1.0 |
| Services | 91.5 | 125.5 | +34.1 |
| Rents | 98.8 | 103.8 | +5.1 |
Visual Comparison
Overall
Prescott Valley-Prescott 98.3
Burlington-South Burlington 100.9
Goods
Prescott Valley-Prescott 96.2
Burlington-South Burlington 97.3
Services
Prescott Valley-Prescott 91.5
Burlington-South Burlington 125.5
Rents
Prescott Valley-Prescott 98.8
Burlington-South Burlington 103.8
Vertical line = national average (100)
Salary Equivalents
What a salary in Prescott Valley-Prescott would need to be in Burlington-South Burlington for the same purchasing power:
| In Prescott Valley-Prescott | In Burlington-South Burlington | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $51,371 | +$1,371 |
| $75,000 | $77,056 | +$2,056 |
| $100,000 | $102,742 | +$2,742 |
| $150,000 | $154,113 | +$4,113 |
$ in Prescott Valley-Prescott = in Burlington-South Burlington
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (98.3 → 100.9), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Prescott Valley-Prescott
98.3
Cost Index
Burlington-South Burlington
100.9
Cost Index
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Burlington-South Burlington more expensive than Prescott Valley-Prescott?
Burlington-South Burlington is 2.7% more expensive than Prescott Valley-Prescott. The overall cost index is 100.9 vs 98.3 (national average = 100).
What salary in Burlington-South Burlington equals $100K in Prescott Valley-Prescott?
A $100,000 salary in Prescott Valley-Prescott has the same purchasing power as $102,742 in Burlington-South Burlington. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
How do rents compare between Prescott Valley-Prescott and Burlington-South Burlington?
Rents in Prescott Valley-Prescott are indexed at 98.8 while Burlington-South Burlington is at 103.8 (national average = 100). Burlington-South Burlington has higher rents.
Data sources
- BEA Regional Price Parities (RPP), the cost-of-living indices shown on this page
- U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey (ACS), gross-rent observations behind the rents component
- BLS Consumer Price Index (CPI), goods and services price relatives
- BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS), labor-driven services component
- HUD Fair Market Rents (FMR), 40th-percentile rent cross-reference
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.