Port St. Lucie vs Kennewick-Richland

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Kennewick-Richland is 0.1% less expensive than Port St. Lucie.

0.1% less expensive

Kennewick-Richland, WA is 0.1% less expensive than Port St. Lucie, FL on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 100.1 vs 100.2). A $100,000 salary in Port St. Lucie buys about the same as $99,851 in Kennewick-Richland; the largest component gap is rents.

  • Overall RPP 100.2 (Port St. Lucie) vs 100.1 (Kennewick-Richland)
  • $100k in Port St. Lucie ≈ $99,851 purchasing power in Kennewick-Richland
  • Rents drives the gap (-18.8 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair FL:WA 100.2→100.1

PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-ABOVE · PP-PAR

  • PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
  • CROSS-STATE FL × WA
  • SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
  • BOTH-ABOVE Both above 100
  • PP-PAR PP near-par

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

Port St. Lucie
100.2
Cost Index
Kennewick-Richland
100.1
Cost Index

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Port St. Lucie, FL and Kennewick-Richland, WA are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.1 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.

Rents creates the largest separation: Kennewick-Richland is 18.8 points lower. But goods and services move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

Both metros exceed the U.S. benchmark of 100. The choice is between two national premiums, so local wages need to clear the higher baseline in either market.

For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Port St. Lucie corresponds to $99,851 in Kennewick-Richland.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Port St. Lucie
100.2
Kennewick-Richland
100.1
Goods
Port St. Lucie
96.2
Kennewick-Richland
105.0
Services
Port St. Lucie
87.0
Kennewick-Richland
93.6
Rents
Port St. Lucie
113.6
Kennewick-Richland
94.8

Vertical line = national average (100)

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Port St. Lucie would need to be in Kennewick-Richland for the same purchasing power:

In Port St. Lucie In Kennewick-Richland Difference
$50,000 $49,926 $-74
$75,000 $74,889 $-111
$100,000 $99,851 $-149
$150,000 $149,777 $-223
$ in Port St. Lucie = in Kennewick-Richland

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (100.2 → 100.1), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Kennewick-Richland more expensive than Port St. Lucie?

Kennewick-Richland is 0.1% less expensive than Port St. Lucie. The overall cost index is 100.1 vs 100.2 (national average = 100).

What salary in Kennewick-Richland equals $100K in Port St. Lucie?

A $100,000 salary in Port St. Lucie has the same purchasing power as $99,851 in Kennewick-Richland. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Port St. Lucie and Kennewick-Richland?

Rents in Port St. Lucie are indexed at 113.6 while Kennewick-Richland is at 94.8 (national average = 100). Port St. Lucie has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.