Parkersburg-Vienna vs Waterloo-Cedar Falls

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Waterloo-Cedar Falls is 0% less expensive than Parkersburg-Vienna.

0% less expensive

Waterloo-Cedar Falls, IA is 0% less expensive than Parkersburg-Vienna, WV on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 87.1 vs 87.1). A $100,000 salary in Parkersburg-Vienna buys about the same as $99,990 in Waterloo-Cedar Falls; the largest component gap is rents.

  • Overall RPP 87.1 (Parkersburg-Vienna) vs 87.1 (Waterloo-Cedar Falls)
  • $100k in Parkersburg-Vienna ≈ $99,990 purchasing power in Waterloo-Cedar Falls
  • Rents drives the gap (+17.2 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair WV:IA 87.1→87.1

PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR

  • PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
  • CROSS-STATE WV × IA
  • SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
  • BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
  • PP-PAR PP near-par

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

Parkersburg-Vienna
87.1
Cost Index
Waterloo-Cedar Falls
87.1
Cost Index

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Parkersburg-Vienna, WV and Waterloo-Cedar Falls, IA are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.0 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.

Rents creates the largest separation: Waterloo-Cedar Falls is 17.2 points higher. But rents move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.

For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Parkersburg-Vienna corresponds to $99,990 in Waterloo-Cedar Falls.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Parkersburg-Vienna
87.1
Waterloo-Cedar Falls
87.1
Goods
Parkersburg-Vienna
96.3
Waterloo-Cedar Falls
93.7
Services
Parkersburg-Vienna
92.9
Waterloo-Cedar Falls
83.7
Rents
Parkersburg-Vienna
45.9
Waterloo-Cedar Falls
63.1

Vertical line = national average (100)

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Parkersburg-Vienna would need to be in Waterloo-Cedar Falls for the same purchasing power:

In Parkersburg-Vienna In Waterloo-Cedar Falls Difference
$50,000 $49,995 $-5
$75,000 $74,992 $-8
$100,000 $99,990 $-10
$150,000 $149,984 $-16
$ in Parkersburg-Vienna = in Waterloo-Cedar Falls

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (87.1 → 87.1), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Waterloo-Cedar Falls more expensive than Parkersburg-Vienna?

Waterloo-Cedar Falls is 0% less expensive than Parkersburg-Vienna. The overall cost index is 87.1 vs 87.1 (national average = 100).

What salary in Waterloo-Cedar Falls equals $100K in Parkersburg-Vienna?

A $100,000 salary in Parkersburg-Vienna has the same purchasing power as $99,990 in Waterloo-Cedar Falls. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Parkersburg-Vienna and Waterloo-Cedar Falls?

Rents in Parkersburg-Vienna are indexed at 45.9 while Waterloo-Cedar Falls is at 63.1 (national average = 100). Waterloo-Cedar Falls has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.