Overall
- Yakima
- 95.5
Diff -4.5 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Yakima is 4.5% less expensive than Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville.
Yakima, WA is 4.5% less expensive than Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 95.5 vs 100.0). A $100,000 salary in Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville buys about the same as $95,540 in Yakima; the largest component gap is rents.
RPP parity plate
Pair FL:WA 100.0→95.5
TIER-NEAR · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BENCH-CROSS · PP-SHIFT
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Diff -4.5 RPP
Diff +8.8 RPP
Diff +3.8 RPP
Diff -39.1 RPP
| Category | Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville | Yakima | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 100.0 | 95.5 | -4.5 |
| Goods | 96.2 | 105.0 | +8.8 |
| Services | 88.1 | 91.9 | +3.8 |
| Rents | 111.7 | 72.6 | -39.1 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Rents creates the largest separation: Yakima is 39.1 points lower. But goods and services move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Yakima, WA is 4.5% less expensive than Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 4.5-point overall gap.
This route crosses the national benchmark: Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville is above 100 while Yakima is below it. That makes the move a change of price regime, not merely a rank swap.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville corresponds to $95,540 in Yakima.
What a salary in Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville would need to be in Yakima for the same purchasing power:
| In Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville | In Yakima | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $47,770 | $-2,230 |
| $75,000 | $71,655 | $-3,345 |
| $100,000 | $95,540 | $-4,460 |
| $150,000 | $143,310 | $-6,690 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (100.0 → 95.5), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville and Yakima share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 6.9 to 4.5 RPP points. Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Services changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 26.9 points between the first and latest shared releases (23.1 to 3.8 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville RPP | Yakima RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 99.9 | 93.0 | 6.9 points Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville higher |
| 2012 | 98.0 | 97.1 | 0.9 points Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville higher |
| 2016 | 98.8 | 94.4 | 4.4 points Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville higher |
| 2020 | 96.8 | 96.2 | 0.6 points Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville higher |
| 2024 | 100.0 | 95.5 | 4.5 points Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
Yakima is 4.5% less expensive than Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville. The overall cost index is 95.5 vs 100.0 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville has the same purchasing power as $95,540 in Yakima. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville are indexed at 111.7 while Yakima is at 72.6 (national average = 100). Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.