Overall
- Owensboro
- 88.6
- Cedar Rapids
- 89.0
Diff +0.4 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Cedar Rapids is 0.4% more expensive than Owensboro.
Cedar Rapids, IA is 0.4% more expensive than Owensboro, KY on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 89.0 vs 88.6). A $100,000 salary in Owensboro buys about the same as $100,398 in Cedar Rapids; the largest component gap is rents.
RPP parity plate
Pair KY:IA 88.6→89.0
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Owensboro, KY and Cedar Rapids, IA are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.4 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Rents creates the largest separation: Cedar Rapids is 15.7 points higher. But goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Owensboro corresponds to $100,398 in Cedar Rapids.
Diff +0.4 RPP
Diff -2.5 RPP
Diff +8.8 RPP
Diff +15.7 RPP
| Category | Owensboro | Cedar Rapids | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 88.6 | 89.0 | +0.4 |
| Goods | 96.2 | 93.7 | -2.5 |
| Services | 75.2 | 84.0 | +8.8 |
| Rents | 55.7 | 71.4 | +15.7 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Owensboro and Cedar Rapids share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 4.3 to 0.4 RPP points. Cedar Rapids remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Rents changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 3.0 points between the first and latest shared releases (18.7 to 15.7 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Owensboro RPP | Cedar Rapids RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 88.6 | 92.9 | 4.3 points Cedar Rapids higher |
| 2012 | 93.7 | 93.7 | 0.0 points Cedar Rapids higher |
| 2016 | 92.1 | 91.1 | 1.0 points Owensboro higher |
| 2020 | 89.0 | 91.2 | 2.2 points Cedar Rapids higher |
| 2024 | 88.6 | 89.0 | 0.4 points Cedar Rapids higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
What a salary in Owensboro would need to be in Cedar Rapids for the same purchasing power:
| In Owensboro | In Cedar Rapids | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $50,199 | +$199 |
| $75,000 | $75,299 | +$299 |
| $100,000 | $100,398 | +$398 |
| $150,000 | $150,598 | +$598 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (88.6 → 89.0), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Cedar Rapids is 0.4% more expensive than Owensboro. The overall cost index is 89.0 vs 88.6 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Owensboro has the same purchasing power as $100,398 in Cedar Rapids. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Owensboro are indexed at 55.7 while Cedar Rapids is at 71.4 (national average = 100). Cedar Rapids has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.