Overall
Diff +0.3 RPP
Omaha vs Memphis
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Memphis is 0.3% more expensive than Omaha.
0.3% more expensive
Memphis, TN-MS-AR is 0.3% more expensive than Omaha, NE-IA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 92.2 vs 91.9). A $100,000 salary in Omaha buys about the same as $100,292 in Memphis; the largest component gap is rents.
- Overall RPP 91.9 (Omaha) vs 92.2 (Memphis)
- $100k in Omaha ≈ $100,292 purchasing power in Memphis
- Rents drives the gap (-6.6 RPP points)
RPP parity plate
Pair NE:TN 91.9→92.2
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
- PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
- CROSS-STATE NE × TN
- SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
- BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
- PP-PAR PP near-par
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Omaha
91.9
Cost Index
Memphis
92.2
Cost Index
What This Comparison Actually Tells You
Omaha, NE-IA and Memphis, TN-MS-AR are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.3 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Rents creates the largest separation: Memphis is 6.6 points lower. But rents and services move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Omaha corresponds to $100,292 in Memphis.
Category Breakdown
Goods
Diff +2.2 RPP
Services
Diff -2.3 RPP
Rents
Diff -6.6 RPP
| Category | Omaha | Memphis | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 91.9 | 92.2 | +0.3 |
| Goods | 94.1 | 96.2 | +2.2 |
| Services | 76.4 | 74.1 | -2.3 |
| Rents | 86.4 | 79.8 | -6.6 |
Visual Comparison
Overall
Omaha 91.9
Memphis 92.2
Goods
Omaha 94.1
Memphis 96.2
Services
Omaha 76.4
Memphis 74.1
Rents
Omaha 86.4
Memphis 79.8
Vertical line = national average (100)
Salary Equivalents
What a salary in Omaha would need to be in Memphis for the same purchasing power:
| In Omaha | In Memphis | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $50,146 | +$146 |
| $75,000 | $75,219 | +$219 |
| $100,000 | $100,292 | +$292 |
| $150,000 | $150,437 | +$437 |
$ in Omaha = in Memphis
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (91.9 → 92.2), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Memphis more expensive than Omaha?
Memphis is 0.3% more expensive than Omaha. The overall cost index is 92.2 vs 91.9 (national average = 100).
What salary in Memphis equals $100K in Omaha?
A $100,000 salary in Omaha has the same purchasing power as $100,292 in Memphis. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
How do rents compare between Omaha and Memphis?
Rents in Omaha are indexed at 86.4 while Memphis is at 79.8 (national average = 100). Omaha has higher rents.
Data sources
- BEA Regional Price Parities (RPP), the cost-of-living indices shown on this page
- U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey (ACS), gross-rent observations behind the rents component
- BLS Consumer Price Index (CPI), goods and services price relatives
- BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS), labor-driven services component
- HUD Fair Market Rents (FMR), 40th-percentile rent cross-reference
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.