Overall
- Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
- 103.7
- Tucson
- 96.9
Diff -6.8 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Tucson is 6.5% less expensive than Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater.
Tucson, AZ is 6.5% less expensive than Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater, WA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 96.9 vs 103.7). A $100,000 salary in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater buys about the same as $93,466 in Tucson; the largest component gap is rents.
RPP parity plate
Pair WA:AZ 103.7→96.9
TIER-NEAR · CROSS-STATE · RENT-LED · BENCH-CROSS · PP-SHIFT
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
What a salary in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater would need to be in Tucson for the same purchasing power:
| In Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater | In Tucson | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $46,733 | $-3,267 |
| $75,000 | $70,099 | $-4,901 |
| $100,000 | $93,466 | $-6,534 |
| $150,000 | $140,199 | $-9,801 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (103.7 → 96.9), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Tucson, AZ is 6.5% less expensive than Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater, WA, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 6.8-point overall gap.
This route crosses the national benchmark: Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater is above 100 while Tucson is below it. That makes the move a change of price regime, not merely a rank swap.
Rents leads the difference, with Tucson 24.9 points lower than Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater. Goods, services, and rents all point in the same broad direction, making the headline comparison more transferable across household types.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater corresponds to $93,466 in Tucson.
Diff -6.8 RPP
Diff -8.8 RPP
Diff -2.2 RPP
Diff -24.9 RPP
| Category | Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater | Tucson | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 103.7 | 96.9 | -6.8 |
| Goods | 105.0 | 96.2 | -8.8 |
| Services | 91.7 | 89.5 | -2.2 |
| Rents | 116.7 | 91.8 | -24.9 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater and Tucson share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 8.3 to 6.8 RPP points. Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Services changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 13.2 points between the first and latest shared releases (11.0 to 2.2 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater RPP | Tucson RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 105.4 | 97.1 | 8.3 points Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater higher |
| 2012 | 101.3 | 100.6 | 0.7 points Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater higher |
| 2016 | 106.0 | 96.6 | 9.5 points Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater higher |
| 2020 | 101.9 | 94.0 | 7.9 points Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater higher |
| 2024 | 103.7 | 96.9 | 6.8 points Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
Tucson is 6.5% less expensive than Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater. The overall cost index is 96.9 vs 103.7 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater has the same purchasing power as $93,466 in Tucson. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater are indexed at 116.7 while Tucson is at 91.8 (national average = 100). Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.