Overall
- Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
- 103.7
- St. George
- 97.3
Diff -6.3 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. St. George is 6.1% less expensive than Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater.
St. George, UT is 6.1% less expensive than Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater, WA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 97.3 vs 103.7). A $100,000 salary in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater buys about the same as $93,876 in St. George; the largest component gap is rents.
RPP parity plate
Pair WA:UT 103.7→97.3
TIER-NEAR · CROSS-STATE · RENT-LED · BENCH-CROSS · PP-SHIFT
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
What a salary in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater would need to be in St. George for the same purchasing power:
| In Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater | In St. George | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $46,938 | $-3,062 |
| $75,000 | $70,407 | $-4,593 |
| $100,000 | $93,876 | $-6,124 |
| $150,000 | $140,814 | $-9,186 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (103.7 → 97.3), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
St. George, UT is 6.1% less expensive than Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater, WA, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 6.3-point overall gap.
This route crosses the national benchmark: Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater is above 100 while St. George is below it. That makes the move a change of price regime, not merely a rank swap.
Rents leads the difference, with St. George 18.5 points lower than Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater. Goods, services, and rents all point in the same broad direction, making the headline comparison more transferable across household types.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater corresponds to $93,876 in St. George.
Diff -6.3 RPP
Diff -8.6 RPP
Diff -14.0 RPP
Diff -18.5 RPP
| Category | Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater | St. George | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 103.7 | 97.3 | -6.3 |
| Goods | 105.0 | 96.4 | -8.6 |
| Services | 91.7 | 77.7 | -14.0 |
| Rents | 116.7 | 98.1 | -18.5 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater and St. George share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap held broadly steady, moving from 6.8 to 6.3 RPP points. Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Goods changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 2.9 points between the first and latest shared releases (5.7 to 8.6 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater RPP | St. George RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 105.4 | 98.5 | 6.8 points Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater higher |
| 2012 | 101.3 | 96.4 | 4.9 points Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater higher |
| 2016 | 106.0 | 99.2 | 6.9 points Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater higher |
| 2020 | 101.9 | 95.9 | 6.0 points Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater higher |
| 2024 | 103.7 | 97.3 | 6.3 points Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
St. George is 6.1% less expensive than Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater. The overall cost index is 97.3 vs 103.7 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater has the same purchasing power as $93,876 in St. George. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater are indexed at 116.7 while St. George is at 98.1 (national average = 100). Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.