Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater vs Slidell-Mandeville-Covington

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Slidell-Mandeville-Covington is 10.6% less expensive than Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater.

10.6% less expensive

Slidell-Mandeville-Covington, LA is 10.6% less expensive than Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater, WA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 92.7 vs 103.7). A $100,000 salary in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater buys about the same as $89,443 in Slidell-Mandeville-Covington; the largest component gap is rents.

  • Overall RPP 103.7 (Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater) vs 92.7 (Slidell-Mandeville-Covington)
  • $100k in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater ≈ $89,443 purchasing power in Slidell-Mandeville-Covington
  • Rents drives the gap (-31.2 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair WA:LA 103.7→92.7

TIER-GAP · CROSS-STATE · RENT-LED · BENCH-CROSS · PP-SHIFT

  • TIER-GAP Clear tier gap
  • CROSS-STATE WA × LA
  • RENT-LED Rent-led gap
  • BENCH-CROSS Benchmark cross
  • PP-SHIFT PP shift

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater would need to be in Slidell-Mandeville-Covington for the same purchasing power:

In Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater In Slidell-Mandeville-Covington Difference
$50,000 $44,722 $-5,278
$75,000 $67,083 $-7,917
$100,000 $89,443 $-10,557
$150,000 $134,165 $-15,835
$ in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater = in Slidell-Mandeville-Covington

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (103.7 → 92.7), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater, WA and Slidell-Mandeville-Covington, LA sit in clearly different price tiers, separated by 10.9 RPP points. At this distance, treating the same nominal salary as equivalent would materially change purchasing power.

This route crosses the national benchmark: Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater is above 100 while Slidell-Mandeville-Covington is below it. That makes the move a change of price regime, not merely a rank swap.

Rents leads the difference, with Slidell-Mandeville-Covington 31.2 points lower than Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater. Goods, services, and rents all point in the same broad direction, making the headline comparison more transferable across household types.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater corresponds to $89,443 in Slidell-Mandeville-Covington.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
103.7
Slidell-Mandeville-Covington
92.7
Goods
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
105.0
Slidell-Mandeville-Covington
93.7
Services
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
91.7
Slidell-Mandeville-Covington
71.7
Rents
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
116.7
Slidell-Mandeville-Covington
85.4

Vertical line = national average (100)

Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
103.7
Cost Index
Slidell-Mandeville-Covington
92.7
Cost Index

How the Price Gap Changed

Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater and Slidell-Mandeville-Covington share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap widened, moving from 8.6 to 10.9 RPP points. Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.

Services changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 28.7 points between the first and latest shared releases (8.6 to 20.1 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.

Release Year Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater RPP Slidell-Mandeville-Covington RPP Relative Gap
2008 105.4 96.7 8.6 points Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater higher
2012 101.3 97.6 3.7 points Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater higher
2016 106.0 98.7 7.3 points Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater higher
2020 101.9 95.7 6.2 points Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater higher
2024 103.7 92.7 10.9 points Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater higher

Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Slidell-Mandeville-Covington more expensive than Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater?

Slidell-Mandeville-Covington is 10.6% less expensive than Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater. The overall cost index is 92.7 vs 103.7 (national average = 100).

What salary in Slidell-Mandeville-Covington equals $100K in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater?

A $100,000 salary in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater has the same purchasing power as $89,443 in Slidell-Mandeville-Covington. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater and Slidell-Mandeville-Covington?

Rents in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater are indexed at 116.7 while Slidell-Mandeville-Covington is at 85.4 (national average = 100). Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.