Overall
- Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
- 103.7
- Sierra Vista-Douglas
- 89.2
Diff -14.4 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Sierra Vista-Douglas is 13.9% less expensive than Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater.
Sierra Vista-Douglas, AZ is 13.9% less expensive than Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater, WA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 89.2 vs 103.7). A $100,000 salary in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater buys about the same as $86,084 in Sierra Vista-Douglas; the largest component gap is rents.
RPP parity plate
Pair WA:AZ 103.7→89.2
TIER-GAP · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BENCH-CROSS · PP-SHIFT
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Diff -14.4 RPP
Diff -8.8 RPP
Diff +0.2 RPP
Diff -54.8 RPP
| Category | Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater | Sierra Vista-Douglas | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 103.7 | 89.2 | -14.4 |
| Goods | 105.0 | 96.2 | -8.8 |
| Services | 91.7 | 91.9 | +0.2 |
| Rents | 116.7 | 61.9 | -54.8 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Rents creates the largest separation: Sierra Vista-Douglas is 54.8 points lower. But services move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater, WA and Sierra Vista-Douglas, AZ sit in clearly different price tiers, separated by 14.4 RPP points. At this distance, treating the same nominal salary as equivalent would materially change purchasing power.
This route crosses the national benchmark: Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater is above 100 while Sierra Vista-Douglas is below it. That makes the move a change of price regime, not merely a rank swap.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater corresponds to $86,084 in Sierra Vista-Douglas.
What a salary in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater would need to be in Sierra Vista-Douglas for the same purchasing power:
| In Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater | In Sierra Vista-Douglas | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $43,042 | $-6,958 |
| $75,000 | $64,563 | $-10,437 |
| $100,000 | $86,084 | $-13,916 |
| $150,000 | $129,126 | $-20,874 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (103.7 → 89.2), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Sierra Vista-Douglas is 13.9% less expensive than Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater. The overall cost index is 89.2 vs 103.7 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater has the same purchasing power as $86,084 in Sierra Vista-Douglas. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater are indexed at 116.7 while Sierra Vista-Douglas is at 61.9 (national average = 100). Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.