Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater vs Mount Vernon-Anacortes

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Mount Vernon-Anacortes is 1.2% less expensive than Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater.

1.2% less expensive

Mount Vernon-Anacortes, WA is 1.2% less expensive than Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater, WA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 102.4 vs 103.7). A $100,000 salary in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater buys about the same as $98,816 in Mount Vernon-Anacortes; the largest component gap is rents.

  • Overall RPP 103.7 (Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater) vs 102.4 (Mount Vernon-Anacortes)
  • $100k in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater ≈ $98,816 purchasing power in Mount Vernon-Anacortes
  • Rents drives the gap (-8.5 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair WA:WA 103.7→102.4

PHOTO-FINISH · SAME-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-ABOVE · PP-PAR

  • PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
  • SAME-STATE Same state · WA
  • SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
  • BOTH-ABOVE Both above 100
  • PP-PAR PP near-par

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
103.7
Cost Index
Mount Vernon-Anacortes
102.4
Cost Index

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater, WA and Mount Vernon-Anacortes, WA are a photo finish on overall price level, only 1.2 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.

Rents creates the largest separation: Mount Vernon-Anacortes is 8.5 points lower. But services and goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

Both metros exceed the U.S. benchmark of 100. The choice is between two national premiums, so local wages need to clear the higher baseline in either market.

For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater corresponds to $98,816 in Mount Vernon-Anacortes.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
103.7
Mount Vernon-Anacortes
102.4
Goods
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
105.0
Mount Vernon-Anacortes
105.0
Services
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
91.7
Mount Vernon-Anacortes
96.0
Rents
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
116.7
Mount Vernon-Anacortes
108.2

Vertical line = national average (100)

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater would need to be in Mount Vernon-Anacortes for the same purchasing power:

In Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater In Mount Vernon-Anacortes Difference
$50,000 $49,408 $-592
$75,000 $74,112 $-888
$100,000 $98,816 $-1,184
$150,000 $148,225 $-1,775
$ in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater = in Mount Vernon-Anacortes

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (103.7 → 102.4), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Mount Vernon-Anacortes more expensive than Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater?

Mount Vernon-Anacortes is 1.2% less expensive than Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater. The overall cost index is 102.4 vs 103.7 (national average = 100).

What salary in Mount Vernon-Anacortes equals $100K in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater?

A $100,000 salary in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater has the same purchasing power as $98,816 in Mount Vernon-Anacortes. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater and Mount Vernon-Anacortes?

Rents in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater are indexed at 116.7 while Mount Vernon-Anacortes is at 108.2 (national average = 100). Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.