Ogden vs Napa

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Napa is 12.2% more expensive than Ogden.

12.2% more expensive

Napa, CA is 12.2% more expensive than Ogden, UT on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 112.6 vs 100.3). A $100,000 salary in Ogden buys about the same as $112,163 in Napa; the largest component gap is rents.

  • Overall RPP 100.3 (Ogden) vs 112.6 (Napa)
  • $100k in Ogden ≈ $112,163 purchasing power in Napa
  • Rents drives the gap (+79.5 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair UT:CA 100.3→112.6

TIER-GAP · CROSS-STATE · RENT-LED · BOTH-ABOVE · PP-SHIFT

  • TIER-GAP Clear tier gap
  • CROSS-STATE UT × CA
  • RENT-LED Rent-led gap
  • BOTH-ABOVE Both above 100
  • PP-SHIFT PP shift

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Ogden would need to be in Napa for the same purchasing power:

In Ogden In Napa Difference
$50,000 $56,081 +$6,081
$75,000 $84,122 +$9,122
$100,000 $112,163 +$12,163
$150,000 $168,244 +$18,244
$ in Ogden = in Napa

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (100.3 → 112.6), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Both metros exceed the U.S. benchmark of 100. The choice is between two national premiums, so local wages need to clear the higher baseline in either market.

Ogden, UT and Napa, CA sit in clearly different price tiers, separated by 12.2 RPP points. At this distance, treating the same nominal salary as equivalent would materially change purchasing power.

Rents leads the difference, with Napa 79.5 points higher than Ogden. Goods, services, and rents all point in the same broad direction, making the headline comparison more transferable across household types.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Ogden corresponds to $112,163 in Napa.

Category Breakdown

Overall

Ogden
100.3
Napa
112.6

Diff +12.2 RPP

Services

Ogden
78.8
Napa
156.5

Diff +77.8 RPP

Rents

Ogden
117.9
Napa
197.4

Diff +79.5 RPP

Visual Comparison

Overall
Ogden
100.3
Napa
112.6
Goods
Ogden
96.4
Napa
105.2
Services
Ogden
78.8
Napa
156.5
Rents
Ogden
117.9
Napa
197.4

Vertical line = national average (100)

Ogden
100.3
Cost Index
Napa
112.6
Cost Index

How the Price Gap Changed

Ogden and Napa share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 20.2 to 12.2 RPP points. Napa remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.

Services changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 34.4 points between the first and latest shared releases (43.4 to 77.8 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.

Release Year Ogden RPP Napa RPP Relative Gap
2008 95.0 115.2 20.2 points Napa higher
2012 100.9 111.6 10.7 points Napa higher
2016 96.3 117.8 21.5 points Napa higher
2020 95.8 112.2 16.4 points Napa higher
2024 100.3 112.6 12.2 points Napa higher

Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Napa more expensive than Ogden?

Napa is 12.2% more expensive than Ogden. The overall cost index is 112.6 vs 100.3 (national average = 100).

What salary in Napa equals $100K in Ogden?

A $100,000 salary in Ogden has the same purchasing power as $112,163 in Napa. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Ogden and Napa?

Rents in Ogden are indexed at 117.9 while Napa is at 197.4 (national average = 100). Napa has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.