Overall
- Tulsa
- 89.2
Diff -23.3 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Tulsa is 20.7% less expensive than New York-Newark-Jersey City.
Tulsa, OK is 20.7% less expensive than New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 89.2 vs 112.6). A $100,000 salary in New York-Newark-Jersey City buys about the same as $79,257 in Tulsa; the largest component gap is rents.
RPP parity plate
Pair NY:OK 112.6→89.2
TIER-GAP · CROSS-STATE · RENT-LED · BENCH-CROSS · PP-STEEP
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
What a salary in New York-Newark-Jersey City would need to be in Tulsa for the same purchasing power:
| In New York-Newark-Jersey City | In Tulsa | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $39,628 | $-10,372 |
| $75,000 | $59,443 | $-15,557 |
| $100,000 | $79,257 | $-20,743 |
| $150,000 | $118,885 | $-31,115 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (112.6 → 89.2), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ and Tulsa, OK sit in clearly different price tiers, separated by 23.3 RPP points. At this distance, treating the same nominal salary as equivalent would materially change purchasing power.
This route crosses the national benchmark: New York-Newark-Jersey City is above 100 while Tulsa is below it. That makes the move a change of price regime, not merely a rank swap.
Rents leads the difference, with Tulsa 80.4 points lower than New York-Newark-Jersey City. Goods, services, and rents all point in the same broad direction, making the headline comparison more transferable across household types.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in New York-Newark-Jersey City corresponds to $79,257 in Tulsa.
Diff -23.3 RPP
Diff -16.5 RPP
Diff -53.2 RPP
Diff -80.4 RPP
| Category | New York-Newark-Jersey City | Tulsa | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 112.6 | 89.2 | -23.3 |
| Goods | 110.3 | 93.8 | -16.5 |
| Services | 127.0 | 73.9 | -53.2 |
| Rents | 148.6 | 68.2 | -80.4 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Tulsa is 20.7% less expensive than New York-Newark-Jersey City. The overall cost index is 89.2 vs 112.6 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in New York-Newark-Jersey City has the same purchasing power as $79,257 in Tulsa. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in New York-Newark-Jersey City are indexed at 148.6 while Tulsa is at 68.2 (national average = 100). New York-Newark-Jersey City has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.