New York-Newark-Jersey City vs Chicago-Naperville-Elgin

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Chicago-Naperville-Elgin is 8% less expensive than New York-Newark-Jersey City.

8% less expensive

Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN is 8% less expensive than New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 103.6 vs 112.6). A $100,000 salary in New York-Newark-Jersey City buys about the same as $92,033 in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin; the largest component gap is services.

  • Overall RPP 112.6 (New York-Newark-Jersey City) vs 103.6 (Chicago-Naperville-Elgin)
  • $100k in New York-Newark-Jersey City ≈ $92,033 purchasing power in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin
  • Services drives the gap (-43.4 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair NY:IL 112.6→103.6

TIER-GAP · CROSS-STATE · SERVICES-LED · BOTH-ABOVE · PP-SHIFT

  • TIER-GAP Clear tier gap
  • CROSS-STATE NY × IL
  • SERVICES-LED Services-led gap
  • BOTH-ABOVE Both above 100
  • PP-SHIFT PP shift

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Both metros exceed the U.S. benchmark of 100. The choice is between two national premiums, so local wages need to clear the higher baseline in either market.

New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ and Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN sit in clearly different price tiers, separated by 9.0 RPP points. At this distance, treating the same nominal salary as equivalent would materially change purchasing power.

Services leads the difference, with Chicago-Naperville-Elgin 43.4 points lower than New York-Newark-Jersey City. Goods, services, and rents all point in the same broad direction, making the headline comparison more transferable across household types.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in New York-Newark-Jersey City to $92,033 in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, but it is not a personal spending weight.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
New York-Newark-Jersey City
112.6
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin
103.6
Goods
New York-Newark-Jersey City
110.3
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin
107.3
Services
New York-Newark-Jersey City
127.0
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin
83.6
Rents
New York-Newark-Jersey City
148.6
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin
112.0

Vertical line = national average (100)

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in New York-Newark-Jersey City would need to be in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin for the same purchasing power:

In New York-Newark-Jersey City In Chicago-Naperville-Elgin Difference
$50,000 $46,016 $-3,984
$75,000 $69,025 $-5,975
$100,000 $92,033 $-7,967
$150,000 $138,049 $-11,951
$ in New York-Newark-Jersey City = in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (112.6 → 103.6), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

New York-Newark-Jersey City
112.6
Cost Index
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin
103.6
Cost Index

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Chicago-Naperville-Elgin more expensive than New York-Newark-Jersey City?

Chicago-Naperville-Elgin is 8% less expensive than New York-Newark-Jersey City. The overall cost index is 103.6 vs 112.6 (national average = 100).

What salary in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin equals $100K in New York-Newark-Jersey City?

A $100,000 salary in New York-Newark-Jersey City has the same purchasing power as $92,033 in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between New York-Newark-Jersey City and Chicago-Naperville-Elgin?

Rents in New York-Newark-Jersey City are indexed at 148.6 while Chicago-Naperville-Elgin is at 112.0 (national average = 100). New York-Newark-Jersey City has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.