Overall
- New Haven
- 104.6
Diff -6.3 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Prescott Valley-Prescott is 6% less expensive than New Haven.
Prescott Valley-Prescott, AZ is 6% less expensive than New Haven, CT on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 98.3 vs 104.6). A $100,000 salary in New Haven buys about the same as $93,971 in Prescott Valley-Prescott; the largest component gap is services.
RPP parity plate
Pair CT:AZ 104.6→98.3
TIER-NEAR · CROSS-STATE · SERVICES-LED · BENCH-CROSS · PP-SHIFT
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Prescott Valley-Prescott, AZ is 6% less expensive than New Haven, CT, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 6.3-point overall gap.
This route crosses the national benchmark: New Haven is above 100 while Prescott Valley-Prescott is below it. That makes the move a change of price regime, not merely a rank swap.
Services leads the difference, with Prescott Valley-Prescott 53.4 points lower than New Haven. Goods, services, and rents all point in the same broad direction, making the headline comparison more transferable across household types.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in New Haven to $93,971 in Prescott Valley-Prescott, but it is not a personal spending weight.
New Haven and Prescott Valley-Prescott share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 11.6 to 6.3 RPP points. New Haven remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Services changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 14.5 points between the first and latest shared releases (67.9 to 53.4 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | New Haven RPP | Prescott Valley-Prescott RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 114.6 | 103.0 | 11.6 points New Haven higher |
| 2012 | 111.0 | 96.5 | 14.5 points New Haven higher |
| 2016 | 109.3 | 98.6 | 10.7 points New Haven higher |
| 2020 | 104.0 | 93.2 | 10.8 points New Haven higher |
| 2024 | 104.6 | 98.3 | 6.3 points New Haven higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
Diff -6.3 RPP
Diff -1.1 RPP
Diff -53.4 RPP
Diff -25.5 RPP
| Category | New Haven | Prescott Valley-Prescott | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 104.6 | 98.3 | -6.3 |
| Goods | 97.3 | 96.2 | -1.1 |
| Services | 144.8 | 91.5 | -53.4 |
| Rents | 124.3 | 98.8 | -25.5 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
What a salary in New Haven would need to be in Prescott Valley-Prescott for the same purchasing power:
| In New Haven | In Prescott Valley-Prescott | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $46,985 | $-3,015 |
| $75,000 | $70,478 | $-4,522 |
| $100,000 | $93,971 | $-6,029 |
| $150,000 | $140,956 | $-9,044 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (104.6 → 98.3), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Prescott Valley-Prescott is 6% less expensive than New Haven. The overall cost index is 98.3 vs 104.6 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in New Haven has the same purchasing power as $93,971 in Prescott Valley-Prescott. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in New Haven are indexed at 124.3 while Prescott Valley-Prescott is at 98.8 (national average = 100). New Haven has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.