Overall
- Napa
- 112.6
- Port St. Lucie
- 100.2
Diff -12.3 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Port St. Lucie is 11% less expensive than Napa.
Port St. Lucie, FL is 11% less expensive than Napa, CA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 100.2 vs 112.6). A $100,000 salary in Napa buys about the same as $89,049 in Port St. Lucie; the largest component gap is rents.
RPP parity plate
Pair CA:FL 112.6→100.2
TIER-GAP · CROSS-STATE · RENT-LED · BOTH-ABOVE · PP-SHIFT
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
What a salary in Napa would need to be in Port St. Lucie for the same purchasing power:
| In Napa | In Port St. Lucie | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $44,524 | $-5,476 |
| $75,000 | $66,787 | $-8,213 |
| $100,000 | $89,049 | $-10,951 |
| $150,000 | $133,573 | $-16,427 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (112.6 → 100.2), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Both metros exceed the U.S. benchmark of 100. The choice is between two national premiums, so local wages need to clear the higher baseline in either market.
Napa, CA and Port St. Lucie, FL sit in clearly different price tiers, separated by 12.3 RPP points. At this distance, treating the same nominal salary as equivalent would materially change purchasing power.
Rents leads the difference, with Port St. Lucie 83.8 points lower than Napa. Goods, services, and rents all point in the same broad direction, making the headline comparison more transferable across household types.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Napa corresponds to $89,049 in Port St. Lucie.
Diff -12.3 RPP
Diff -8.9 RPP
Diff -69.5 RPP
Diff -83.8 RPP
| Category | Napa | Port St. Lucie | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 112.6 | 100.2 | -12.3 |
| Goods | 105.2 | 96.2 | -8.9 |
| Services | 156.5 | 87.0 | -69.5 |
| Rents | 197.4 | 113.6 | -83.8 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Napa and Port St. Lucie share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 14.1 to 12.3 RPP points. Napa remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Rents changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 57.8 points between the first and latest shared releases (26.0 to 83.8 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Napa RPP | Port St. Lucie RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 115.2 | 101.1 | 14.1 points Napa higher |
| 2012 | 111.6 | 99.2 | 12.5 points Napa higher |
| 2016 | 117.8 | 100.5 | 17.3 points Napa higher |
| 2020 | 112.2 | 98.6 | 13.6 points Napa higher |
| 2024 | 112.6 | 100.2 | 12.3 points Napa higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
Port St. Lucie is 11% less expensive than Napa. The overall cost index is 100.2 vs 112.6 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Napa has the same purchasing power as $89,049 in Port St. Lucie. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Napa are indexed at 197.4 while Port St. Lucie is at 113.6 (national average = 100). Napa has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.