Overall
Diff -16.1 RPP
Napa vs Missoula
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Missoula is 14.3% less expensive than Napa.
14.3% less expensive
Missoula, MT is 14.3% less expensive than Napa, CA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 96.4 vs 112.6). A $100,000 salary in Napa buys about the same as $85,688 in Missoula; the largest component gap is rents.
- Overall RPP 112.6 (Napa) vs 96.4 (Missoula)
- $100k in Napa ≈ $85,688 purchasing power in Missoula
- Rents drives the gap (-102.5 RPP points)
RPP parity plate
Pair CA:MT 112.6→96.4
TIER-GAP · CROSS-STATE · RENT-LED · BENCH-CROSS · PP-SHIFT
- TIER-GAP Clear tier gap
- CROSS-STATE CA × MT
- RENT-LED Rent-led gap
- BENCH-CROSS Benchmark cross
- PP-SHIFT PP shift
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Salary Equivalents
What a salary in Napa would need to be in Missoula for the same purchasing power:
| In Napa | In Missoula | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $42,844 | $-7,156 |
| $75,000 | $64,266 | $-10,734 |
| $100,000 | $85,688 | $-14,312 |
| $150,000 | $128,532 | $-21,468 |
$ in Napa = in Missoula
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (112.6 → 96.4), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
What This Comparison Actually Tells You
Napa, CA and Missoula, MT sit in clearly different price tiers, separated by 16.1 RPP points. At this distance, treating the same nominal salary as equivalent would materially change purchasing power.
This route crosses the national benchmark: Napa is above 100 while Missoula is below it. That makes the move a change of price regime, not merely a rank swap.
Rents leads the difference, with Missoula 102.5 points lower than Napa. Goods, services, and rents all point in the same broad direction, making the headline comparison more transferable across household types.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Napa corresponds to $85,688 in Missoula.
Category Breakdown
Goods
Diff -9.2 RPP
Services
Diff -84.5 RPP
Rents
Diff -102.5 RPP
| Category | Napa | Missoula | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 112.6 | 96.4 | -16.1 |
| Goods | 105.2 | 96.0 | -9.2 |
| Services | 156.5 | 72.1 | -84.5 |
| Rents | 197.4 | 94.9 | -102.5 |
Visual Comparison
Overall
Napa 112.6
Missoula 96.4
Goods
Napa 105.2
Missoula 96.0
Services
Napa 156.5
Missoula 72.1
Rents
Napa 197.4
Missoula 94.9
Vertical line = national average (100)
Napa
112.6
Cost Index
Missoula
96.4
Cost Index
How the Price Gap Changed
Napa and Missoula share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 17.3 to 16.1 RPP points. Napa remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Rents changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 48.2 points between the first and latest shared releases (54.3 to 102.5 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Napa RPP | Missoula RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 115.2 | 98.0 | 17.3 points Napa higher |
| 2012 | 111.6 | 93.9 | 17.7 points Napa higher |
| 2016 | 117.8 | 95.8 | 22.0 points Napa higher |
| 2020 | 112.2 | 93.9 | 18.3 points Napa higher |
| 2024 | 112.6 | 96.4 | 16.1 points Napa higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Missoula more expensive than Napa?
Missoula is 14.3% less expensive than Napa. The overall cost index is 96.4 vs 112.6 (national average = 100).
What salary in Missoula equals $100K in Napa?
A $100,000 salary in Napa has the same purchasing power as $85,688 in Missoula. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
How do rents compare between Napa and Missoula?
Rents in Napa are indexed at 197.4 while Missoula is at 94.9 (national average = 100). Napa has higher rents.
Data sources
- BEA Regional Price Parities (RPP), the cost-of-living indices shown on this page
- U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey (ACS), gross-rent observations behind the rents component
- BLS Consumer Price Index (CPI), goods and services price relatives
- BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS), labor-driven services component
- HUD Fair Market Rents (FMR), 40th-percentile rent cross-reference
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.