Napa vs Lawrence

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Lawrence is 19.8% less expensive than Napa.

19.8% less expensive

Lawrence, KS is 19.8% less expensive than Napa, CA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 90.2 vs 112.6). A $100,000 salary in Napa buys about the same as $80,178 in Lawrence; the largest component gap is rents.

  • Overall RPP 112.6 (Napa) vs 90.2 (Lawrence)
  • $100k in Napa ≈ $80,178 purchasing power in Lawrence
  • Rents drives the gap (-125.8 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair CA:KS 112.6→90.2

TIER-GAP · CROSS-STATE · RENT-LED · BENCH-CROSS · PP-STEEP

  • TIER-GAP Clear tier gap
  • CROSS-STATE CA × KS
  • RENT-LED Rent-led gap
  • BENCH-CROSS Benchmark cross
  • PP-STEEP Steep PP convert

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Napa would need to be in Lawrence for the same purchasing power:

In Napa In Lawrence Difference
$50,000 $40,089 $-9,911
$75,000 $60,133 $-14,867
$100,000 $80,178 $-19,822
$150,000 $120,266 $-29,734
$ in Napa = in Lawrence

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (112.6 → 90.2), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Napa, CA and Lawrence, KS sit in clearly different price tiers, separated by 22.3 RPP points. At this distance, treating the same nominal salary as equivalent would materially change purchasing power.

This route crosses the national benchmark: Napa is above 100 while Lawrence is below it. That makes the move a change of price regime, not merely a rank swap.

Rents leads the difference, with Lawrence 125.8 points lower than Napa. Goods, services, and rents all point in the same broad direction, making the headline comparison more transferable across household types.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Napa corresponds to $80,178 in Lawrence.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Napa
112.6
Lawrence
90.2
Goods
Napa
105.2
Lawrence
94.0
Services
Napa
156.5
Lawrence
89.3
Rents
Napa
197.4
Lawrence
71.6

Vertical line = national average (100)

Napa
112.6
Cost Index
Lawrence
90.2
Cost Index

How the Price Gap Changed

Napa and Lawrence share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap widened, moving from 17.1 to 22.3 RPP points. Napa remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.

Rents changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 79.4 points between the first and latest shared releases (46.4 to 125.8 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.

Release Year Napa RPP Lawrence RPP Relative Gap
2008 115.2 98.2 17.1 points Napa higher
2012 111.6 96.0 15.6 points Napa higher
2016 117.8 94.1 23.6 points Napa higher
2020 112.2 94.0 18.3 points Napa higher
2024 112.6 90.2 22.3 points Napa higher

Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Lawrence more expensive than Napa?

Lawrence is 19.8% less expensive than Napa. The overall cost index is 90.2 vs 112.6 (national average = 100).

What salary in Lawrence equals $100K in Napa?

A $100,000 salary in Napa has the same purchasing power as $80,178 in Lawrence. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Napa and Lawrence?

Rents in Napa are indexed at 197.4 while Lawrence is at 71.6 (national average = 100). Napa has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.