Overall
- Napa
- 112.6
- Kansas City
- 92.5
Diff -20.0 RPP
Napa vs Kansas City
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Kansas City is 17.8% less expensive than Napa.
17.8% less expensive
Kansas City, MO-KS is 17.8% less expensive than Napa, CA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 92.5 vs 112.6). A $100,000 salary in Napa buys about the same as $82,221 in Kansas City; the largest component gap is rents.
- Overall RPP 112.6 (Napa) vs 92.5 (Kansas City)
- $100k in Napa ≈ $82,221 purchasing power in Kansas City
- Rents drives the gap (-110.8 RPP points)
RPP parity plate
Pair CA:MO 112.6→92.5
TIER-GAP · CROSS-STATE · RENT-LED · BENCH-CROSS · PP-STEEP
- TIER-GAP Clear tier gap
- CROSS-STATE CA × MO
- RENT-LED Rent-led gap
- BENCH-CROSS Benchmark cross
- PP-STEEP Steep PP convert
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Salary Equivalents
What a salary in Napa would need to be in Kansas City for the same purchasing power:
| In Napa | In Kansas City | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $41,110 | $-8,890 |
| $75,000 | $61,666 | $-13,334 |
| $100,000 | $82,221 | $-17,779 |
| $150,000 | $123,331 | $-26,669 |
$ in Napa = in Kansas City
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (112.6 → 92.5), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
What This Comparison Actually Tells You
Napa, CA and Kansas City, MO-KS sit in clearly different price tiers, separated by 20.0 RPP points. At this distance, treating the same nominal salary as equivalent would materially change purchasing power.
This route crosses the national benchmark: Napa is above 100 while Kansas City is below it. That makes the move a change of price regime, not merely a rank swap.
Rents leads the difference, with Kansas City 110.8 points lower than Napa. Goods, services, and rents all point in the same broad direction, making the headline comparison more transferable across household types.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Napa corresponds to $82,221 in Kansas City.
Category Breakdown
Goods
- Napa
- 105.2
- Kansas City
- 94.1
Diff -11.0 RPP
Services
- Napa
- 156.5
- Kansas City
- 89.0
Diff -67.5 RPP
Rents
- Napa
- 197.4
- Kansas City
- 86.6
Diff -110.8 RPP
| Category | Napa | Kansas City | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 112.6 | 92.5 | -20.0 |
| Goods | 105.2 | 94.1 | -11.0 |
| Services | 156.5 | 89.0 | -67.5 |
| Rents | 197.4 | 86.6 | -110.8 |
Visual Comparison
Overall
Napa 112.6
Kansas City 92.5
Goods
Napa 105.2
Kansas City 94.1
Services
Napa 156.5
Kansas City 89.0
Rents
Napa 197.4
Kansas City 86.6
Vertical line = national average (100)
Napa
112.6
Cost Index
Kansas City
92.5
Cost Index
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Kansas City more expensive than Napa?
Kansas City is 17.8% less expensive than Napa. The overall cost index is 92.5 vs 112.6 (national average = 100).
What salary in Kansas City equals $100K in Napa?
A $100,000 salary in Napa has the same purchasing power as $82,221 in Kansas City. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
How do rents compare between Napa and Kansas City?
Rents in Napa are indexed at 197.4 while Kansas City is at 86.6 (national average = 100). Napa has higher rents.
Data sources
- BEA Regional Price Parities (RPP), the cost-of-living indices shown on this page
- U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey (ACS), gross-rent observations behind the rents component
- BLS Consumer Price Index (CPI), goods and services price relatives
- BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS), labor-driven services component
- HUD Fair Market Rents (FMR), 40th-percentile rent cross-reference
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.