Muskegon-Norton Shores vs Dayton-Kettering-Beavercreek

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Dayton-Kettering-Beavercreek is 0.2% more expensive than Muskegon-Norton Shores.

0.2% more expensive

Dayton-Kettering-Beavercreek, OH is 0.2% more expensive than Muskegon-Norton Shores, MI on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 92.7 vs 92.5). A $100,000 salary in Muskegon-Norton Shores buys about the same as $100,189 in Dayton-Kettering-Beavercreek; the largest component gap is services.

  • Overall RPP 92.5 (Muskegon-Norton Shores) vs 92.7 (Dayton-Kettering-Beavercreek)
  • $100k in Muskegon-Norton Shores ≈ $100,189 purchasing power in Dayton-Kettering-Beavercreek
  • Services drives the gap (+2.6 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair MI:OH 92.5→92.7

PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR

  • PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
  • CROSS-STATE MI × OH
  • SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
  • BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
  • PP-PAR PP near-par

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

Muskegon-Norton Shores
92.5
Cost Index
Dayton-Kettering-Beavercreek
92.7
Cost Index

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Muskegon-Norton Shores, MI and Dayton-Kettering-Beavercreek, OH are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.2 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.

Services creates the largest separation: Dayton-Kettering-Beavercreek is 2.6 points higher. But rents and goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.

For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Muskegon-Norton Shores to $100,189 in Dayton-Kettering-Beavercreek, but it is not a personal spending weight.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Muskegon-Norton Shores
92.5
Dayton-Kettering-Beavercreek
92.7
Goods
Muskegon-Norton Shores
93.7
Dayton-Kettering-Beavercreek
93.6
Services
Muskegon-Norton Shores
92.8
Dayton-Kettering-Beavercreek
95.4
Rents
Muskegon-Norton Shores
74.2
Dayton-Kettering-Beavercreek
72.7

Vertical line = national average (100)

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Muskegon-Norton Shores would need to be in Dayton-Kettering-Beavercreek for the same purchasing power:

In Muskegon-Norton Shores In Dayton-Kettering-Beavercreek Difference
$50,000 $50,095 +$95
$75,000 $75,142 +$142
$100,000 $100,189 +$189
$150,000 $150,284 +$284
$ in Muskegon-Norton Shores = in Dayton-Kettering-Beavercreek

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (92.5 → 92.7), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Dayton-Kettering-Beavercreek more expensive than Muskegon-Norton Shores?

Dayton-Kettering-Beavercreek is 0.2% more expensive than Muskegon-Norton Shores. The overall cost index is 92.7 vs 92.5 (national average = 100).

What salary in Dayton-Kettering-Beavercreek equals $100K in Muskegon-Norton Shores?

A $100,000 salary in Muskegon-Norton Shores has the same purchasing power as $100,189 in Dayton-Kettering-Beavercreek. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Muskegon-Norton Shores and Dayton-Kettering-Beavercreek?

Rents in Muskegon-Norton Shores are indexed at 74.2 while Dayton-Kettering-Beavercreek is at 72.7 (national average = 100). Muskegon-Norton Shores has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.