Overall
- Mount Vernon-Anacortes
- 102.4
- Napa
- 112.6
Diff +10.1 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Napa is 9.9% more expensive than Mount Vernon-Anacortes.
Napa, CA is 9.9% more expensive than Mount Vernon-Anacortes, WA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 112.6 vs 102.4). A $100,000 salary in Mount Vernon-Anacortes buys about the same as $109,870 in Napa; the largest component gap is rents.
RPP parity plate
Pair WA:CA 102.4→112.6
TIER-GAP · CROSS-STATE · RENT-LED · BOTH-ABOVE · PP-SHIFT
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
What a salary in Mount Vernon-Anacortes would need to be in Napa for the same purchasing power:
| In Mount Vernon-Anacortes | In Napa | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $54,935 | +$4,935 |
| $75,000 | $82,402 | +$7,402 |
| $100,000 | $109,870 | +$9,870 |
| $150,000 | $164,805 | +$14,805 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (102.4 → 112.6), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Both metros exceed the U.S. benchmark of 100. The choice is between two national premiums, so local wages need to clear the higher baseline in either market.
Mount Vernon-Anacortes, WA and Napa, CA sit in clearly different price tiers, separated by 10.1 RPP points. At this distance, treating the same nominal salary as equivalent would materially change purchasing power.
Rents leads the difference, with Napa 89.3 points higher than Mount Vernon-Anacortes. Goods, services, and rents all point in the same broad direction, making the headline comparison more transferable across household types.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Mount Vernon-Anacortes corresponds to $109,870 in Napa.
Diff +10.1 RPP
Diff +0.1 RPP
Diff +60.5 RPP
Diff +89.3 RPP
| Category | Mount Vernon-Anacortes | Napa | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 102.4 | 112.6 | +10.1 |
| Goods | 105.0 | 105.2 | +0.1 |
| Services | 96.0 | 156.5 | +60.5 |
| Rents | 108.2 | 197.4 | +89.3 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Napa is 9.9% more expensive than Mount Vernon-Anacortes. The overall cost index is 112.6 vs 102.4 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Mount Vernon-Anacortes has the same purchasing power as $109,870 in Napa. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Mount Vernon-Anacortes are indexed at 108.2 while Napa is at 197.4 (national average = 100). Napa has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.