Mount Vernon-Anacortes vs Lancaster

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Lancaster is 4.1% less expensive than Mount Vernon-Anacortes.

4.1% less expensive

Lancaster, PA is 4.1% less expensive than Mount Vernon-Anacortes, WA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 98.3 vs 102.4). A $100,000 salary in Mount Vernon-Anacortes buys about the same as $95,914 in Lancaster; the largest component gap is rents.

  • Overall RPP 102.4 (Mount Vernon-Anacortes) vs 98.3 (Lancaster)
  • $100k in Mount Vernon-Anacortes ≈ $95,914 purchasing power in Lancaster
  • Rents drives the gap (-14.4 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair WA:PA 102.4→98.3

TIER-NEAR · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BENCH-CROSS · PP-SHIFT

  • TIER-NEAR Near tier
  • CROSS-STATE WA × PA
  • SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
  • BENCH-CROSS Benchmark cross
  • PP-SHIFT PP shift

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Mount Vernon-Anacortes
102.4
Lancaster
98.3
Goods
Mount Vernon-Anacortes
105.0
Lancaster
100.7
Services
Mount Vernon-Anacortes
96.0
Lancaster
107.3
Rents
Mount Vernon-Anacortes
108.2
Lancaster
93.8

Vertical line = national average (100)

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Rents creates the largest separation: Lancaster is 14.4 points lower. But services move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.

Lancaster, PA is 4.1% less expensive than Mount Vernon-Anacortes, WA, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 4.2-point overall gap.

This route crosses the national benchmark: Mount Vernon-Anacortes is above 100 while Lancaster is below it. That makes the move a change of price regime, not merely a rank swap.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Mount Vernon-Anacortes corresponds to $95,914 in Lancaster.

Mount Vernon-Anacortes
102.4
Cost Index
Lancaster
98.3
Cost Index

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Mount Vernon-Anacortes would need to be in Lancaster for the same purchasing power:

In Mount Vernon-Anacortes In Lancaster Difference
$50,000 $47,957 $-2,043
$75,000 $71,935 $-3,065
$100,000 $95,914 $-4,086
$150,000 $143,871 $-6,129
$ in Mount Vernon-Anacortes = in Lancaster

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (102.4 → 98.3), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Lancaster more expensive than Mount Vernon-Anacortes?

Lancaster is 4.1% less expensive than Mount Vernon-Anacortes. The overall cost index is 98.3 vs 102.4 (national average = 100).

What salary in Lancaster equals $100K in Mount Vernon-Anacortes?

A $100,000 salary in Mount Vernon-Anacortes has the same purchasing power as $95,914 in Lancaster. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Mount Vernon-Anacortes and Lancaster?

Rents in Mount Vernon-Anacortes are indexed at 108.2 while Lancaster is at 93.8 (national average = 100). Mount Vernon-Anacortes has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.