Overall
Diff +0.1 RPP
Monroe vs Roanoke
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Roanoke is 0.1% more expensive than Monroe.
0.1% more expensive
Roanoke, VA is 0.1% more expensive than Monroe, MI on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 93.6 vs 93.5). A $100,000 salary in Monroe buys about the same as $100,135 in Roanoke; the largest component gap is services.
- Overall RPP 93.5 (Monroe) vs 93.6 (Roanoke)
- $100k in Monroe ≈ $100,135 purchasing power in Roanoke
- Services drives the gap (-4.8 RPP points)
RPP parity plate
Pair MI:VA 93.5→93.6
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
- PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
- CROSS-STATE MI × VA
- SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
- BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
- PP-PAR PP near-par
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Monroe
93.5
Cost Index
Roanoke
93.6
Cost Index
What This Comparison Actually Tells You
Monroe, MI and Roanoke, VA are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.1 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Services creates the largest separation: Roanoke is 4.8 points lower. But services move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Monroe to $100,135 in Roanoke, but it is not a personal spending weight.
Category Breakdown
Goods
Diff +3.1 RPP
Services
Diff -4.8 RPP
Rents
Diff +3.9 RPP
| Category | Monroe | Roanoke | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 93.5 | 93.6 | +0.1 |
| Goods | 93.7 | 96.8 | +3.1 |
| Services | 93.7 | 88.9 | -4.8 |
| Rents | 74.6 | 78.5 | +3.9 |
Visual Comparison
Overall
Monroe 93.5
Roanoke 93.6
Goods
Monroe 93.7
Roanoke 96.8
Services
Monroe 93.7
Roanoke 88.9
Rents
Monroe 74.6
Roanoke 78.5
Vertical line = national average (100)
Salary Equivalents
What a salary in Monroe would need to be in Roanoke for the same purchasing power:
| In Monroe | In Roanoke | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $50,067 | +$67 |
| $75,000 | $75,101 | +$101 |
| $100,000 | $100,135 | +$135 |
| $150,000 | $150,202 | +$202 |
$ in Monroe = in Roanoke
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (93.5 → 93.6), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Roanoke more expensive than Monroe?
Roanoke is 0.1% more expensive than Monroe. The overall cost index is 93.6 vs 93.5 (national average = 100).
What salary in Roanoke equals $100K in Monroe?
A $100,000 salary in Monroe has the same purchasing power as $100,135 in Roanoke. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
How do rents compare between Monroe and Roanoke?
Rents in Monroe are indexed at 74.6 while Roanoke is at 78.5 (national average = 100). Roanoke has higher rents.
Data sources
- BEA Regional Price Parities (RPP), the cost-of-living indices shown on this page
- U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey (ACS), gross-rent observations behind the rents component
- BLS Consumer Price Index (CPI), goods and services price relatives
- BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS), labor-driven services component
- HUD Fair Market Rents (FMR), 40th-percentile rent cross-reference
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.