Overall
- Clarksville
- 90.9
Diff -0.7 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Clarksville is 0.8% less expensive than Michigan City-La Porte.
Clarksville, TN-KY is 0.8% less expensive than Michigan City-La Porte, IN on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 90.9 vs 91.7). A $100,000 salary in Michigan City-La Porte buys about the same as $99,198 in Clarksville; the largest component gap is services.
RPP parity plate
Pair IN:TN 91.7→90.9
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Michigan City-La Porte, IN and Clarksville, TN-KY are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.7 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Services creates the largest separation: Clarksville is 13.9 points lower. But rents and goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Michigan City-La Porte to $99,198 in Clarksville, but it is not a personal spending weight.
Diff -0.7 RPP
Diff +1.9 RPP
Diff -13.9 RPP
Diff +5.4 RPP
| Category | Michigan City-La Porte | Clarksville | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 91.7 | 90.9 | -0.7 |
| Goods | 94.3 | 96.2 | +1.9 |
| Services | 86.4 | 72.5 | -13.9 |
| Rents | 68.5 | 73.8 | +5.4 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Michigan City-La Porte and Clarksville share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 6.8 to 0.7 RPP points. Michigan City-La Porte remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Goods changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 17.8 points between the first and latest shared releases (19.8 to 1.9 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Michigan City-La Porte RPP | Clarksville RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 83.7 | 90.5 | 6.8 points Clarksville higher |
| 2012 | 88.9 | 93.0 | 4.1 points Clarksville higher |
| 2016 | 87.1 | 93.6 | 6.5 points Clarksville higher |
| 2020 | 91.9 | 88.8 | 3.1 points Michigan City-La Porte higher |
| 2024 | 91.7 | 90.9 | 0.7 points Michigan City-La Porte higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
What a salary in Michigan City-La Porte would need to be in Clarksville for the same purchasing power:
| In Michigan City-La Porte | In Clarksville | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $49,599 | $-401 |
| $75,000 | $74,399 | $-601 |
| $100,000 | $99,198 | $-802 |
| $150,000 | $148,797 | $-1,203 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (91.7 → 90.9), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Clarksville is 0.8% less expensive than Michigan City-La Porte. The overall cost index is 90.9 vs 91.7 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Michigan City-La Porte has the same purchasing power as $99,198 in Clarksville. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Michigan City-La Porte are indexed at 68.5 while Clarksville is at 73.8 (national average = 100). Clarksville has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.