Overall
- Merced
- 98.3
- Walla Walla
- 98.5
Diff +0.2 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Walla Walla is 0.2% more expensive than Merced.
Walla Walla, WA is 0.2% more expensive than Merced, CA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 98.5 vs 98.3). A $100,000 salary in Merced buys about the same as $100,248 in Walla Walla; the largest component gap is services.
RPP parity plate
Pair CA:WA 98.3→98.5
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Merced, CA and Walla Walla, WA are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.2 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Services creates the largest separation: Walla Walla is 64.0 points lower. But services and goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Merced to $100,248 in Walla Walla, but it is not a personal spending weight.
Diff +0.2 RPP
Diff -0.1 RPP
Diff -64.0 RPP
Diff +7.9 RPP
| Category | Merced | Walla Walla | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 98.3 | 98.5 | +0.2 |
| Goods | 105.2 | 105.0 | -0.1 |
| Services | 158.3 | 94.3 | -64.0 |
| Rents | 78.6 | 86.6 | +7.9 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Merced and Walla Walla share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 1.4 to 0.2 RPP points. Walla Walla remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Services changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 29.0 points between the first and latest shared releases (35.0 to 64.0 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Merced RPP | Walla Walla RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 94.3 | 95.6 | 1.4 points Walla Walla higher |
| 2012 | 98.6 | 95.1 | 3.4 points Merced higher |
| 2016 | 95.3 | 96.3 | 1.0 points Walla Walla higher |
| 2020 | 98.7 | 95.2 | 3.6 points Merced higher |
| 2024 | 98.3 | 98.5 | 0.2 points Walla Walla higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
What a salary in Merced would need to be in Walla Walla for the same purchasing power:
| In Merced | In Walla Walla | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $50,124 | +$124 |
| $75,000 | $75,186 | +$186 |
| $100,000 | $100,248 | +$248 |
| $150,000 | $150,372 | +$372 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (98.3 → 98.5), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Walla Walla is 0.2% more expensive than Merced. The overall cost index is 98.5 vs 98.3 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Merced has the same purchasing power as $100,248 in Walla Walla. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Merced are indexed at 78.6 while Walla Walla is at 86.6 (national average = 100). Walla Walla has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.