Overall
- Merced
- 98.3
- Kennewick-Richland
- 100.1
Diff +1.8 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Kennewick-Richland is 1.8% more expensive than Merced.
Kennewick-Richland, WA is 1.8% more expensive than Merced, CA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 100.1 vs 98.3). A $100,000 salary in Merced buys about the same as $101,836 in Kennewick-Richland; the largest component gap is services.
RPP parity plate
Pair CA:WA 98.3→100.1
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BENCH-CROSS · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Merced, CA and Kennewick-Richland, WA are a photo finish on overall price level, only 1.8 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Services creates the largest separation: Kennewick-Richland is 64.8 points lower. But services and goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
This route crosses the national benchmark: Kennewick-Richland is above 100 while Merced is below it. That makes the move a change of price regime, not merely a rank swap.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Merced to $101,836 in Kennewick-Richland, but it is not a personal spending weight.
Diff +1.8 RPP
Diff -0.1 RPP
Diff -64.8 RPP
Diff +16.2 RPP
| Category | Merced | Kennewick-Richland | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 98.3 | 100.1 | +1.8 |
| Goods | 105.2 | 105.0 | -0.1 |
| Services | 158.3 | 93.6 | -64.8 |
| Rents | 78.6 | 94.8 | +16.2 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
What a salary in Merced would need to be in Kennewick-Richland for the same purchasing power:
| In Merced | In Kennewick-Richland | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $50,918 | +$918 |
| $75,000 | $76,377 | +$1,377 |
| $100,000 | $101,836 | +$1,836 |
| $150,000 | $152,753 | +$2,753 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (98.3 → 100.1), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Kennewick-Richland is 1.8% more expensive than Merced. The overall cost index is 100.1 vs 98.3 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Merced has the same purchasing power as $101,836 in Kennewick-Richland. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Merced are indexed at 78.6 while Kennewick-Richland is at 94.8 (national average = 100). Kennewick-Richland has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.