Overall
Diff +5.0 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Ithaca is 5.1% more expensive than Merced.
Ithaca, NY is 5.1% more expensive than Merced, CA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 103.3 vs 98.3). A $100,000 salary in Merced buys about the same as $105,131 in Ithaca; the largest component gap is rents.
RPP parity plate
Pair CA:NY 98.3→103.3
TIER-NEAR · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BENCH-CROSS · PP-SHIFT
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Diff +5.0 RPP
Diff -5.5 RPP
Diff -26.7 RPP
Diff +49.7 RPP
| Category | Merced | Ithaca | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 98.3 | 103.3 | +5.0 |
| Goods | 105.2 | 99.7 | -5.5 |
| Services | 158.3 | 131.6 | -26.7 |
| Rents | 78.6 | 128.4 | +49.7 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Rents creates the largest separation: Ithaca is 49.7 points higher. But services and goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Ithaca, NY is 5.1% more expensive than Merced, CA, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 5.0-point overall gap.
This route crosses the national benchmark: Ithaca is above 100 while Merced is below it. That makes the move a change of price regime, not merely a rank swap.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Merced corresponds to $105,131 in Ithaca.
What a salary in Merced would need to be in Ithaca for the same purchasing power:
| In Merced | In Ithaca | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $52,565 | +$2,565 |
| $75,000 | $78,848 | +$3,848 |
| $100,000 | $105,131 | +$5,131 |
| $150,000 | $157,696 | +$7,696 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (98.3 → 103.3), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Merced and Ithaca share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap held broadly steady, moving from 5.9 to 5.0 RPP points. Ithaca remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Services changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 64.6 points between the first and latest shared releases (37.9 to 26.7 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Merced RPP | Ithaca RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 94.3 | 100.2 | 5.9 points Ithaca higher |
| 2012 | 98.6 | 101.9 | 3.3 points Ithaca higher |
| 2016 | 95.3 | 102.0 | 6.7 points Ithaca higher |
| 2020 | 98.7 | 101.3 | 2.6 points Ithaca higher |
| 2024 | 98.3 | 103.3 | 5.0 points Ithaca higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
Ithaca is 5.1% more expensive than Merced. The overall cost index is 103.3 vs 98.3 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Merced has the same purchasing power as $105,131 in Ithaca. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Merced are indexed at 78.6 while Ithaca is at 128.4 (national average = 100). Ithaca has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.