Overall
Diff -1.8 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Cheyenne is 1.8% less expensive than Merced.
Cheyenne, WY is 1.8% less expensive than Merced, CA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 96.5 vs 98.3). A $100,000 salary in Merced buys about the same as $98,185 in Cheyenne; the largest component gap is services.
RPP parity plate
Pair CA:WY 98.3→96.5
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Merced, CA and Cheyenne, WY are a photo finish on overall price level, only 1.8 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Services creates the largest separation: Cheyenne is 80.4 points lower. But rents move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Merced to $98,185 in Cheyenne, but it is not a personal spending weight.
Diff -1.8 RPP
Diff -9.8 RPP
Diff -80.4 RPP
Diff +11.2 RPP
| Category | Merced | Cheyenne | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 98.3 | 96.5 | -1.8 |
| Goods | 105.2 | 95.4 | -9.8 |
| Services | 158.3 | 78.0 | -80.4 |
| Rents | 78.6 | 89.8 | +11.2 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Merced and Cheyenne share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap widened, moving from 1.3 to 1.8 RPP points. Merced remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Services changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 52.0 points between the first and latest shared releases (28.3 to 80.4 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Merced RPP | Cheyenne RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 94.3 | 95.6 | 1.3 points Cheyenne higher |
| 2012 | 98.6 | 99.2 | 0.6 points Cheyenne higher |
| 2016 | 95.3 | 97.9 | 2.6 points Cheyenne higher |
| 2020 | 98.7 | 91.8 | 7.0 points Merced higher |
| 2024 | 98.3 | 96.5 | 1.8 points Merced higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
What a salary in Merced would need to be in Cheyenne for the same purchasing power:
| In Merced | In Cheyenne | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $49,092 | $-908 |
| $75,000 | $73,639 | $-1,361 |
| $100,000 | $98,185 | $-1,815 |
| $150,000 | $147,277 | $-2,723 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (98.3 → 96.5), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Cheyenne is 1.8% less expensive than Merced. The overall cost index is 96.5 vs 98.3 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Merced has the same purchasing power as $98,185 in Cheyenne. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Merced are indexed at 78.6 while Cheyenne is at 89.8 (national average = 100). Cheyenne has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.