McAllen-Edinburg-Mission vs Paducah

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Paducah is 0.2% more expensive than McAllen-Edinburg-Mission.

0.2% more expensive

Paducah, KY-IL is 0.2% more expensive than McAllen-Edinburg-Mission, TX on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 86.1 vs 85.9). A $100,000 salary in McAllen-Edinburg-Mission buys about the same as $100,220 in Paducah; the largest component gap is rents.

  • Overall RPP 85.9 (McAllen-Edinburg-Mission) vs 86.1 (Paducah)
  • $100k in McAllen-Edinburg-Mission ≈ $100,220 purchasing power in Paducah
  • Rents drives the gap (-7.1 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair TX:KY 85.9→86.1

PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR

  • PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
  • CROSS-STATE TX × KY
  • SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
  • BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
  • PP-PAR PP near-par

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

McAllen-Edinburg-Mission
85.9
Cost Index
Paducah
86.1
Cost Index

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

McAllen-Edinburg-Mission, TX and Paducah, KY-IL are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.2 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.

Rents creates the largest separation: Paducah is 7.1 points lower. But rents and services move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.

For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in McAllen-Edinburg-Mission corresponds to $100,220 in Paducah.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
McAllen-Edinburg-Mission
85.9
Paducah
86.1
Goods
McAllen-Edinburg-Mission
93.8
Paducah
96.0
Services
McAllen-Edinburg-Mission
81.2
Paducah
76.9
Rents
McAllen-Edinburg-Mission
55.9
Paducah
48.8

Vertical line = national average (100)

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in McAllen-Edinburg-Mission would need to be in Paducah for the same purchasing power:

In McAllen-Edinburg-Mission In Paducah Difference
$50,000 $50,110 +$110
$75,000 $75,165 +$165
$100,000 $100,220 +$220
$150,000 $150,330 +$330
$ in McAllen-Edinburg-Mission = in Paducah

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (85.9 → 86.1), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Paducah more expensive than McAllen-Edinburg-Mission?

Paducah is 0.2% more expensive than McAllen-Edinburg-Mission. The overall cost index is 86.1 vs 85.9 (national average = 100).

What salary in Paducah equals $100K in McAllen-Edinburg-Mission?

A $100,000 salary in McAllen-Edinburg-Mission has the same purchasing power as $100,220 in Paducah. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between McAllen-Edinburg-Mission and Paducah?

Rents in McAllen-Edinburg-Mission are indexed at 55.9 while Paducah is at 48.8 (national average = 100). McAllen-Edinburg-Mission has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.