McAllen-Edinburg-Mission vs Dothan

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Dothan is 2.4% less expensive than McAllen-Edinburg-Mission.

2.4% less expensive

Dothan, AL is 2.4% less expensive than McAllen-Edinburg-Mission, TX on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 83.8 vs 85.9). A $100,000 salary in McAllen-Edinburg-Mission buys about the same as $97,599 in Dothan; the largest component gap is rents.

  • Overall RPP 85.9 (McAllen-Edinburg-Mission) vs 83.8 (Dothan)
  • $100k in McAllen-Edinburg-Mission ≈ $97,599 purchasing power in Dothan
  • Rents drives the gap (-9.0 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair TX:AL 85.9→83.8

TIER-NEAR · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR

  • TIER-NEAR Near tier
  • CROSS-STATE TX × AL
  • SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
  • BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
  • PP-PAR PP near-par

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
McAllen-Edinburg-Mission
85.9
Dothan
83.8
Goods
McAllen-Edinburg-Mission
93.8
Dothan
96.4
Services
McAllen-Edinburg-Mission
81.2
Dothan
84.3
Rents
McAllen-Edinburg-Mission
55.9
Dothan
46.9

Vertical line = national average (100)

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Rents creates the largest separation: Dothan is 9.0 points lower. But services and goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.

Dothan, AL is 2.4% less expensive than McAllen-Edinburg-Mission, TX, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 2.1-point overall gap.

Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in McAllen-Edinburg-Mission corresponds to $97,599 in Dothan.

McAllen-Edinburg-Mission
85.9
Cost Index
Dothan
83.8
Cost Index

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in McAllen-Edinburg-Mission would need to be in Dothan for the same purchasing power:

In McAllen-Edinburg-Mission In Dothan Difference
$50,000 $48,800 $-1,200
$75,000 $73,200 $-1,800
$100,000 $97,599 $-2,401
$150,000 $146,399 $-3,601
$ in McAllen-Edinburg-Mission = in Dothan

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (85.9 → 83.8), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Dothan more expensive than McAllen-Edinburg-Mission?

Dothan is 2.4% less expensive than McAllen-Edinburg-Mission. The overall cost index is 83.8 vs 85.9 (national average = 100).

What salary in Dothan equals $100K in McAllen-Edinburg-Mission?

A $100,000 salary in McAllen-Edinburg-Mission has the same purchasing power as $97,599 in Dothan. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between McAllen-Edinburg-Mission and Dothan?

Rents in McAllen-Edinburg-Mission are indexed at 55.9 while Dothan is at 46.9 (national average = 100). McAllen-Edinburg-Mission has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.