Overall
- Manchester-Nashua
- 105.7
- Chicago-Naperville-Elgin
- 103.6
Diff -2.1 RPP
Manchester-Nashua vs Chicago-Naperville-Elgin
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Chicago-Naperville-Elgin is 2% less expensive than Manchester-Nashua.
2% less expensive
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN is 2% less expensive than Manchester-Nashua, NH on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 103.6 vs 105.7). A $100,000 salary in Manchester-Nashua buys about the same as $98,048 in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin; the largest component gap is services.
- Overall RPP 105.7 (Manchester-Nashua) vs 103.6 (Chicago-Naperville-Elgin)
- $100k in Manchester-Nashua ≈ $98,048 purchasing power in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin
- Services drives the gap (-50.0 RPP points)
RPP parity plate
Pair NH:IL 105.7→103.6
TIER-NEAR · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-ABOVE · PP-PAR
- TIER-NEAR Near tier
- CROSS-STATE NH × IL
- SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
- BOTH-ABOVE Both above 100
- PP-PAR PP near-par
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Category Breakdown
Goods
- Manchester-Nashua
- 97.7
- Chicago-Naperville-Elgin
- 107.3
Diff +9.6 RPP
Services
- Manchester-Nashua
- 133.5
Diff -50.0 RPP
Rents
- Manchester-Nashua
- 134.2
- Chicago-Naperville-Elgin
- 112.0
Diff -22.2 RPP
| Category | Manchester-Nashua | Chicago-Naperville-Elgin | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 105.7 | 103.6 | -2.1 |
| Goods | 97.7 | 107.3 | +9.6 |
| Services | 133.5 | 83.6 | -50.0 |
| Rents | 134.2 | 112.0 | -22.2 |
Visual Comparison
Overall
Manchester-Nashua 105.7
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin 103.6
Goods
Manchester-Nashua 97.7
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin 107.3
Services
Manchester-Nashua 133.5
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin 83.6
Rents
Manchester-Nashua 134.2
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin 112.0
Vertical line = national average (100)
What This Comparison Actually Tells You
Services creates the largest separation: Chicago-Naperville-Elgin is 50.0 points lower. But goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN is 2% less expensive than Manchester-Nashua, NH, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 2.1-point overall gap.
Both metros exceed the U.S. benchmark of 100. The choice is between two national premiums, so local wages need to clear the higher baseline in either market.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Manchester-Nashua to $98,048 in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, but it is not a personal spending weight.
Manchester-Nashua
105.7
Cost Index
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin
103.6
Cost Index
Salary Equivalents
What a salary in Manchester-Nashua would need to be in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin for the same purchasing power:
| In Manchester-Nashua | In Chicago-Naperville-Elgin | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $49,024 | $-976 |
| $75,000 | $73,536 | $-1,464 |
| $100,000 | $98,048 | $-1,952 |
| $150,000 | $147,073 | $-2,927 |
$ in Manchester-Nashua = in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (105.7 → 103.6), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
How the Price Gap Changed
Manchester-Nashua and Chicago-Naperville-Elgin share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 3.6 to 2.1 RPP points. Manchester-Nashua remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Services changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 9.9 points between the first and latest shared releases (40.1 to 50.0 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Manchester-Nashua RPP | Chicago-Naperville-Elgin RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 109.0 | 105.4 | 3.6 points Manchester-Nashua higher |
| 2012 | 104.2 | 105.1 | 1.0 points Chicago-Naperville-Elgin higher |
| 2016 | 108.0 | 103.8 | 4.2 points Manchester-Nashua higher |
| 2020 | 104.8 | 104.5 | 0.3 points Manchester-Nashua higher |
| 2024 | 105.7 | 103.6 | 2.1 points Manchester-Nashua higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Chicago-Naperville-Elgin more expensive than Manchester-Nashua?
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin is 2% less expensive than Manchester-Nashua. The overall cost index is 103.6 vs 105.7 (national average = 100).
What salary in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin equals $100K in Manchester-Nashua?
A $100,000 salary in Manchester-Nashua has the same purchasing power as $98,048 in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
How do rents compare between Manchester-Nashua and Chicago-Naperville-Elgin?
Rents in Manchester-Nashua are indexed at 134.2 while Chicago-Naperville-Elgin is at 112.0 (national average = 100). Manchester-Nashua has higher rents.
Data sources
- BEA Regional Price Parities (RPP), the cost-of-living indices shown on this page
- U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey (ACS), gross-rent observations behind the rents component
- BLS Consumer Price Index (CPI), goods and services price relatives
- BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS), labor-driven services component
- HUD Fair Market Rents (FMR), 40th-percentile rent cross-reference
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.