Overall
- Lynchburg
- 89.4
- Wichita Falls
- 89.5
Diff +0.2 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Wichita Falls is 0.2% more expensive than Lynchburg.
Wichita Falls, TX is 0.2% more expensive than Lynchburg, VA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 89.5 vs 89.4). A $100,000 salary in Lynchburg buys about the same as $100,168 in Wichita Falls; the largest component gap is rents.
RPP parity plate
Pair VA:TX 89.4→89.5
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Lynchburg, VA and Wichita Falls, TX are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.2 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Rents creates the largest separation: Wichita Falls is 4.3 points higher. But services and goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Lynchburg corresponds to $100,168 in Wichita Falls.
Diff +0.2 RPP
Diff -3.0 RPP
Diff -3.7 RPP
Diff +4.3 RPP
| Category | Lynchburg | Wichita Falls | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 89.4 | 89.5 | +0.2 |
| Goods | 96.8 | 93.8 | -3.0 |
| Services | 87.8 | 84.1 | -3.7 |
| Rents | 63.9 | 68.2 | +4.3 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
What a salary in Lynchburg would need to be in Wichita Falls for the same purchasing power:
| In Lynchburg | In Wichita Falls | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $50,084 | +$84 |
| $75,000 | $75,126 | +$126 |
| $100,000 | $100,168 | +$168 |
| $150,000 | $150,252 | +$252 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (89.4 → 89.5), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Wichita Falls is 0.2% more expensive than Lynchburg. The overall cost index is 89.5 vs 89.4 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Lynchburg has the same purchasing power as $100,168 in Wichita Falls. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Lynchburg are indexed at 63.9 while Wichita Falls is at 68.2 (national average = 100). Wichita Falls has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.