Overall
- Longview-Kelso
- 97.5
- Richmond
- 97.9
Diff +0.3 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Richmond is 0.3% more expensive than Longview-Kelso.
Richmond, VA is 0.3% more expensive than Longview-Kelso, WA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 97.9 vs 97.5). A $100,000 salary in Longview-Kelso buys about the same as $100,321 in Richmond; the largest component gap is rents.
RPP parity plate
Pair WA:VA 97.5→97.9
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Longview-Kelso, WA and Richmond, VA are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.3 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Rents creates the largest separation: Richmond is 16.6 points higher. But services and goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Longview-Kelso corresponds to $100,321 in Richmond.
Diff +0.3 RPP
Diff -8.3 RPP
Diff -9.2 RPP
Diff +16.6 RPP
| Category | Longview-Kelso | Richmond | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 97.5 | 97.9 | +0.3 |
| Goods | 105.0 | 96.8 | -8.3 |
| Services | 98.5 | 89.2 | -9.2 |
| Rents | 82.5 | 99.1 | +16.6 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
What a salary in Longview-Kelso would need to be in Richmond for the same purchasing power:
| In Longview-Kelso | In Richmond | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $50,160 | +$160 |
| $75,000 | $75,241 | +$241 |
| $100,000 | $100,321 | +$321 |
| $150,000 | $150,481 | +$481 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (97.5 → 97.9), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Richmond is 0.3% more expensive than Longview-Kelso. The overall cost index is 97.9 vs 97.5 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Longview-Kelso has the same purchasing power as $100,321 in Richmond. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Longview-Kelso are indexed at 82.5 while Richmond is at 99.1 (national average = 100). Richmond has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.