Overall
- Longview-Kelso
- 97.5
- Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
- 103.7
Diff +6.1 RPP
Longview-Kelso vs Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater is 6.3% more expensive than Longview-Kelso.
6.3% more expensive
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater, WA is 6.3% more expensive than Longview-Kelso, WA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 103.7 vs 97.5). A $100,000 salary in Longview-Kelso buys about the same as $106,279 in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater; the largest component gap is rents.
- Overall RPP 97.5 (Longview-Kelso) vs 103.7 (Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater)
- $100k in Longview-Kelso ≈ $106,279 purchasing power in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
- Rents drives the gap (+34.1 RPP points)
RPP parity plate
Pair WA:WA 97.5→103.7
TIER-NEAR · SAME-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BENCH-CROSS · PP-SHIFT
- TIER-NEAR Near tier
- SAME-STATE Same state · WA
- SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
- BENCH-CROSS Benchmark cross
- PP-SHIFT PP shift
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Category Breakdown
Goods
- Longview-Kelso
- 105.0
- Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
- 105.0
Diff 0.0 RPP
Services
- Longview-Kelso
- 98.5
Diff -6.8 RPP
Rents
- Longview-Kelso
- 82.5
- Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
- 116.7
Diff +34.1 RPP
| Category | Longview-Kelso | Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 97.5 | 103.7 | +6.1 |
| Goods | 105.0 | 105.0 | 0.0 |
| Services | 98.5 | 91.7 | -6.8 |
| Rents | 82.5 | 116.7 | +34.1 |
Visual Comparison
Overall
Longview-Kelso 97.5
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater 103.7
Goods
Longview-Kelso 105.0
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater 105.0
Services
Longview-Kelso 98.5
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater 91.7
Rents
Longview-Kelso 82.5
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater 116.7
Vertical line = national average (100)
What This Comparison Actually Tells You
Rents creates the largest separation: Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater is 34.1 points higher. But services and goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater, WA is 6.3% more expensive than Longview-Kelso, WA, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 6.1-point overall gap.
This route crosses the national benchmark: Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater is above 100 while Longview-Kelso is below it. That makes the move a change of price regime, not merely a rank swap.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Longview-Kelso corresponds to $106,279 in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater.
Longview-Kelso
97.5
Cost Index
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
103.7
Cost Index
Salary Equivalents
What a salary in Longview-Kelso would need to be in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater for the same purchasing power:
| In Longview-Kelso | In Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $53,140 | +$3,140 |
| $75,000 | $79,709 | +$4,709 |
| $100,000 | $106,279 | +$6,279 |
| $150,000 | $159,419 | +$9,419 |
$ in Longview-Kelso = in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (97.5 → 103.7), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
How the Price Gap Changed
Longview-Kelso and Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 7.2 to 6.1 RPP points. Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Services changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 22.4 points between the first and latest shared releases (15.6 to 6.8 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Longview-Kelso RPP | Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 98.1 | 105.4 | 7.2 points Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater higher |
| 2012 | 92.5 | 101.3 | 8.8 points Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater higher |
| 2016 | 96.8 | 106.0 | 9.2 points Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater higher |
| 2020 | 100.0 | 101.9 | 1.9 points Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater higher |
| 2024 | 97.5 | 103.7 | 6.1 points Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater more expensive than Longview-Kelso?
Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater is 6.3% more expensive than Longview-Kelso. The overall cost index is 103.7 vs 97.5 (national average = 100).
What salary in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater equals $100K in Longview-Kelso?
A $100,000 salary in Longview-Kelso has the same purchasing power as $106,279 in Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
How do rents compare between Longview-Kelso and Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater?
Rents in Longview-Kelso are indexed at 82.5 while Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater is at 116.7 (national average = 100). Olympia-Lacey-Tumwater has higher rents.
Data sources
- BEA Regional Price Parities (RPP), the cost-of-living indices shown on this page
- U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey (ACS), gross-rent observations behind the rents component
- BLS Consumer Price Index (CPI), goods and services price relatives
- BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS), labor-driven services component
- HUD Fair Market Rents (FMR), 40th-percentile rent cross-reference
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.