Overall
- Longview-Kelso
- 97.5
- Chicago-Naperville-Elgin
- 103.6
Diff +6.0 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Chicago-Naperville-Elgin is 6.2% more expensive than Longview-Kelso.
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN is 6.2% more expensive than Longview-Kelso, WA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 103.6 vs 97.5). A $100,000 salary in Longview-Kelso buys about the same as $106,202 in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin; the largest component gap is rents.
RPP parity plate
Pair WA:IL 97.5→103.6
TIER-NEAR · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BENCH-CROSS · PP-SHIFT
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Diff +6.0 RPP
Diff +2.2 RPP
Diff -14.9 RPP
Diff +29.5 RPP
| Category | Longview-Kelso | Chicago-Naperville-Elgin | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 97.5 | 103.6 | +6.0 |
| Goods | 105.0 | 107.3 | +2.2 |
| Services | 98.5 | 83.6 | -14.9 |
| Rents | 82.5 | 112.0 | +29.5 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Rents creates the largest separation: Chicago-Naperville-Elgin is 29.5 points higher. But services move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN is 6.2% more expensive than Longview-Kelso, WA, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 6.0-point overall gap.
This route crosses the national benchmark: Chicago-Naperville-Elgin is above 100 while Longview-Kelso is below it. That makes the move a change of price regime, not merely a rank swap.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Longview-Kelso corresponds to $106,202 in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin.
What a salary in Longview-Kelso would need to be in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin for the same purchasing power:
| In Longview-Kelso | In Chicago-Naperville-Elgin | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $53,101 | +$3,101 |
| $75,000 | $79,652 | +$4,652 |
| $100,000 | $106,202 | +$6,202 |
| $150,000 | $159,303 | +$9,303 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (97.5 → 103.6), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Longview-Kelso and Chicago-Naperville-Elgin share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 7.3 to 6.0 RPP points. Chicago-Naperville-Elgin remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Services changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 45.1 points between the first and latest shared releases (30.2 to 14.9 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Longview-Kelso RPP | Chicago-Naperville-Elgin RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 98.1 | 105.4 | 7.3 points Chicago-Naperville-Elgin higher |
| 2012 | 92.5 | 105.1 | 12.7 points Chicago-Naperville-Elgin higher |
| 2016 | 96.8 | 103.8 | 7.0 points Chicago-Naperville-Elgin higher |
| 2020 | 100.0 | 104.5 | 4.5 points Chicago-Naperville-Elgin higher |
| 2024 | 97.5 | 103.6 | 6.0 points Chicago-Naperville-Elgin higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin is 6.2% more expensive than Longview-Kelso. The overall cost index is 103.6 vs 97.5 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Longview-Kelso has the same purchasing power as $106,202 in Chicago-Naperville-Elgin. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Longview-Kelso are indexed at 82.5 while Chicago-Naperville-Elgin is at 112.0 (national average = 100). Chicago-Naperville-Elgin has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.