Little Rock-North Little Rock-Conway vs Jackson

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Jackson is 0.4% less expensive than Little Rock-North Little Rock-Conway.

0.4% less expensive

Jackson, MS is 0.4% less expensive than Little Rock-North Little Rock-Conway, AR on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 89.0 vs 89.4). A $100,000 salary in Little Rock-North Little Rock-Conway buys about the same as $99,646 in Jackson; the largest component gap is rents.

  • Overall RPP 89.4 (Little Rock-North Little Rock-Conway) vs 89.0 (Jackson)
  • $100k in Little Rock-North Little Rock-Conway ≈ $99,646 purchasing power in Jackson
  • Rents drives the gap (-3.5 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair AR:MS 89.4→89.0

PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR

  • PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
  • CROSS-STATE AR × MS
  • SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
  • BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
  • PP-PAR PP near-par

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

Little Rock-North Little Rock-Conway
89.4
Cost Index
Jackson
89.0
Cost Index

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Little Rock-North Little Rock-Conway, AR and Jackson, MS are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.3 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.

Rents creates the largest separation: Jackson is 3.5 points lower. But services and goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.

For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Little Rock-North Little Rock-Conway corresponds to $99,646 in Jackson.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Little Rock-North Little Rock-Conway
89.4
Jackson
89.0
Goods
Little Rock-North Little Rock-Conway
93.6
Jackson
96.2
Services
Little Rock-North Little Rock-Conway
74.6
Jackson
78.1
Rents
Little Rock-North Little Rock-Conway
68.3
Jackson
64.8

Vertical line = national average (100)

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Little Rock-North Little Rock-Conway would need to be in Jackson for the same purchasing power:

In Little Rock-North Little Rock-Conway In Jackson Difference
$50,000 $49,823 $-177
$75,000 $74,735 $-265
$100,000 $99,646 $-354
$150,000 $149,470 $-530
$ in Little Rock-North Little Rock-Conway = in Jackson

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (89.4 → 89.0), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Jackson more expensive than Little Rock-North Little Rock-Conway?

Jackson is 0.4% less expensive than Little Rock-North Little Rock-Conway. The overall cost index is 89.0 vs 89.4 (national average = 100).

What salary in Jackson equals $100K in Little Rock-North Little Rock-Conway?

A $100,000 salary in Little Rock-North Little Rock-Conway has the same purchasing power as $99,646 in Jackson. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Little Rock-North Little Rock-Conway and Jackson?

Rents in Little Rock-North Little Rock-Conway are indexed at 68.3 while Jackson is at 64.8 (national average = 100). Little Rock-North Little Rock-Conway has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.