PlainCost
Home / Compare /

Lawrence vs Fargo

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Fargo is 0.7% more expensive than Lawrence.

0.7% more expensive

Fargo, ND-MN is 0.7% more expensive than Lawrence, KS on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 90.9 vs 90.2). A $100,000 salary in Lawrence buys about the same as $100,696 in Fargo; the largest component gap is services.

  • Overall RPP 90.2 (Lawrence) vs 90.9 (Fargo)
  • $100k in Lawrence ≈ $100,696 purchasing power in Fargo
  • Services drives the gap (-12.0 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair KS:ND 90.2→90.9

PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR

  • PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
  • CROSS-STATE KS × ND
  • SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
  • BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
  • PP-PAR PP near-par

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

Lawrence
90.2
Cost Index
Fargo
90.9
Cost Index

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Lawrence, KS and Fargo, ND-MN are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.6 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.

Services creates the largest separation: Fargo is 12.0 points lower. But services move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.

For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Lawrence to $100,696 in Fargo, but it is not a personal spending weight.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Lawrence
90.2
Fargo
90.9
Goods
Lawrence
94.0
Fargo
95.7
Services
Lawrence
89.3
Fargo
77.3
Rents
Lawrence
71.6
Fargo
81.1

Vertical line = national average (100)

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Lawrence would need to be in Fargo for the same purchasing power:

In Lawrence In Fargo Difference
$50,000 $50,348 +$348
$75,000 $75,522 +$522
$100,000 $100,696 +$696
$150,000 $151,044 +$1,044
$ in Lawrence = – in Fargo

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (90.2 → 90.9), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

Reverse: Fargo → Lawrence Lawrence Details Fargo Details

Also Compare

vs Las Cruces vs Bowling Green vs Manhattan vs Rome vs Elkhart-Goshen vs Abilene vs Saginaw vs Rochester

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Fargo more expensive than Lawrence?

Fargo is 0.7% more expensive than Lawrence. The overall cost index is 90.9 vs 90.2 (national average = 100).

What salary in Fargo equals $100K in Lawrence?

A $100,000 salary in Lawrence has the same purchasing power as $100,696 in Fargo. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Lawrence and Fargo?

Rents in Lawrence are indexed at 71.6 while Fargo is at 81.1 (national average = 100). Fargo has higher rents.

Data sources

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.