Overall
- Las Cruces
- 90.2
- Elizabethtown
- 90.6
Diff +0.4 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Elizabethtown is 0.4% more expensive than Las Cruces.
Elizabethtown, KY is 0.4% more expensive than Las Cruces, NM on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 90.6 vs 90.2). A $100,000 salary in Las Cruces buys about the same as $100,399 in Elizabethtown; the largest component gap is rents.
RPP parity plate
Pair NM:KY 90.2→90.6
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Las Cruces, NM and Elizabethtown, KY are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.4 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Rents creates the largest separation: Elizabethtown is 3.7 points higher. But services move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Las Cruces corresponds to $100,399 in Elizabethtown.
Diff +0.4 RPP
Diff +0.1 RPP
Diff -3.3 RPP
Diff +3.7 RPP
| Category | Las Cruces | Elizabethtown | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 90.2 | 90.6 | +0.4 |
| Goods | 96.1 | 96.2 | +0.1 |
| Services | 77.9 | 74.6 | -3.3 |
| Rents | 63.0 | 66.7 | +3.7 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
What a salary in Las Cruces would need to be in Elizabethtown for the same purchasing power:
| In Las Cruces | In Elizabethtown | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $50,200 | +$200 |
| $75,000 | $75,299 | +$299 |
| $100,000 | $100,399 | +$399 |
| $150,000 | $150,599 | +$599 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (90.2 → 90.6), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Elizabethtown is 0.4% more expensive than Las Cruces. The overall cost index is 90.6 vs 90.2 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Las Cruces has the same purchasing power as $100,399 in Elizabethtown. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Las Cruces are indexed at 63.0 while Elizabethtown is at 66.7 (national average = 100). Elizabethtown has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.