Las Cruces vs Clarksville

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Clarksville is 0.8% more expensive than Las Cruces.

0.8% more expensive

Clarksville, TN-KY is 0.8% more expensive than Las Cruces, NM on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 90.9 vs 90.2). A $100,000 salary in Las Cruces buys about the same as $100,815 in Clarksville; the largest component gap is rents.

  • Overall RPP 90.2 (Las Cruces) vs 90.9 (Clarksville)
  • $100k in Las Cruces ≈ $100,815 purchasing power in Clarksville
  • Rents drives the gap (+10.8 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair NM:TN 90.2→90.9

PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR

  • PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
  • CROSS-STATE NM × TN
  • SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
  • BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
  • PP-PAR PP near-par

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

Las Cruces
90.2
Cost Index
Clarksville
90.9
Cost Index

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Las Cruces, NM and Clarksville, TN-KY are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.7 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.

Rents creates the largest separation: Clarksville is 10.8 points higher. But services move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.

For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Las Cruces corresponds to $100,815 in Clarksville.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Las Cruces
90.2
Clarksville
90.9
Goods
Las Cruces
96.1
Clarksville
96.2
Services
Las Cruces
77.9
Clarksville
72.5
Rents
Las Cruces
63.0
Clarksville
73.8

Vertical line = national average (100)

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Las Cruces would need to be in Clarksville for the same purchasing power:

In Las Cruces In Clarksville Difference
$50,000 $50,407 +$407
$75,000 $75,611 +$611
$100,000 $100,815 +$815
$150,000 $151,222 +$1,222
$ in Las Cruces = in Clarksville

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (90.2 → 90.9), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Clarksville more expensive than Las Cruces?

Clarksville is 0.8% more expensive than Las Cruces. The overall cost index is 90.9 vs 90.2 (national average = 100).

What salary in Clarksville equals $100K in Las Cruces?

A $100,000 salary in Las Cruces has the same purchasing power as $100,815 in Clarksville. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Las Cruces and Clarksville?

Rents in Las Cruces are indexed at 63.0 while Clarksville is at 73.8 (national average = 100). Clarksville has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.