Overall
- Lancaster
- 98.3
- Champaign-Urbana
- 92.7
Diff -5.6 RPP
Lancaster vs Champaign-Urbana
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Champaign-Urbana is 5.7% less expensive than Lancaster.
5.7% less expensive
Champaign-Urbana, IL is 5.7% less expensive than Lancaster, PA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 92.7 vs 98.3). A $100,000 salary in Lancaster buys about the same as $94,348 in Champaign-Urbana; the largest component gap is rents.
- Overall RPP 98.3 (Lancaster) vs 92.7 (Champaign-Urbana)
- $100k in Lancaster ≈ $94,348 purchasing power in Champaign-Urbana
- Rents drives the gap (-22.2 RPP points)
RPP parity plate
Pair PA:IL 98.3→92.7
TIER-NEAR · CROSS-STATE · RENT-LED · BOTH-BELOW · PP-SHIFT
- TIER-NEAR Near tier
- CROSS-STATE PA × IL
- RENT-LED Rent-led gap
- BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
- PP-SHIFT PP shift
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Salary Equivalents
What a salary in Lancaster would need to be in Champaign-Urbana for the same purchasing power:
| In Lancaster | In Champaign-Urbana | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $47,174 | $-2,826 |
| $75,000 | $70,761 | $-4,239 |
| $100,000 | $94,348 | $-5,652 |
| $150,000 | $141,523 | $-8,477 |
$ in Lancaster = in Champaign-Urbana
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (98.3 → 92.7), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
What This Comparison Actually Tells You
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
Champaign-Urbana, IL is 5.7% less expensive than Lancaster, PA, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 5.6-point overall gap.
Rents leads the difference, with Champaign-Urbana 22.2 points lower than Lancaster. Goods, services, and rents all point in the same broad direction, making the headline comparison more transferable across household types.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Lancaster corresponds to $94,348 in Champaign-Urbana.
Category Breakdown
Goods
- Lancaster
- 100.7
- Champaign-Urbana
- 93.6
Diff -7.0 RPP
Services
- Lancaster
- 107.3
- Champaign-Urbana
- 90.5
Diff -16.8 RPP
Rents
- Lancaster
- 93.8
- Champaign-Urbana
- 71.6
Diff -22.2 RPP
| Category | Lancaster | Champaign-Urbana | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 98.3 | 92.7 | -5.6 |
| Goods | 100.7 | 93.6 | -7.0 |
| Services | 107.3 | 90.5 | -16.8 |
| Rents | 93.8 | 71.6 | -22.2 |
Visual Comparison
Overall
Lancaster 98.3
Champaign-Urbana 92.7
Goods
Lancaster 100.7
Champaign-Urbana 93.6
Services
Lancaster 107.3
Champaign-Urbana 90.5
Rents
Lancaster 93.8
Champaign-Urbana 71.6
Vertical line = national average (100)
Lancaster
98.3
Cost Index
Champaign-Urbana
92.7
Cost Index
How the Price Gap Changed
Lancaster and Champaign-Urbana share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap widened, moving from 4.0 to 5.6 RPP points. Lancaster remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Rents changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 18.7 points between the first and latest shared releases (3.5 to 22.2 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Lancaster RPP | Champaign-Urbana RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 100.2 | 96.2 | 4.0 points Lancaster higher |
| 2012 | 97.8 | 94.2 | 3.6 points Lancaster higher |
| 2016 | 99.4 | 93.7 | 5.7 points Lancaster higher |
| 2020 | 97.9 | 91.9 | 6.0 points Lancaster higher |
| 2024 | 98.3 | 92.7 | 5.6 points Lancaster higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Champaign-Urbana more expensive than Lancaster?
Champaign-Urbana is 5.7% less expensive than Lancaster. The overall cost index is 92.7 vs 98.3 (national average = 100).
What salary in Champaign-Urbana equals $100K in Lancaster?
A $100,000 salary in Lancaster has the same purchasing power as $94,348 in Champaign-Urbana. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
How do rents compare between Lancaster and Champaign-Urbana?
Rents in Lancaster are indexed at 93.8 while Champaign-Urbana is at 71.6 (national average = 100). Lancaster has higher rents.
Data sources
- BEA Regional Price Parities (RPP), the cost-of-living indices shown on this page
- U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey (ACS), gross-rent observations behind the rents component
- BLS Consumer Price Index (CPI), goods and services price relatives
- BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS), labor-driven services component
- HUD Fair Market Rents (FMR), 40th-percentile rent cross-reference
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.