Lake Havasu City-Kingman vs Daphne-Fairhope-Foley

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Daphne-Fairhope-Foley is 0.6% more expensive than Lake Havasu City-Kingman.

0.6% more expensive

Daphne-Fairhope-Foley, AL is 0.6% more expensive than Lake Havasu City-Kingman, AZ on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 94.7 vs 94.1). A $100,000 salary in Lake Havasu City-Kingman buys about the same as $100,629 in Daphne-Fairhope-Foley; the largest component gap is rents.

  • Overall RPP 94.1 (Lake Havasu City-Kingman) vs 94.7 (Daphne-Fairhope-Foley)
  • $100k in Lake Havasu City-Kingman ≈ $100,629 purchasing power in Daphne-Fairhope-Foley
  • Rents drives the gap (+9.4 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair AZ:AL 94.1→94.7

PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR

  • PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
  • CROSS-STATE AZ × AL
  • SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
  • BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
  • PP-PAR PP near-par

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

Lake Havasu City-Kingman
94.1
Cost Index
Daphne-Fairhope-Foley
94.7
Cost Index

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Lake Havasu City-Kingman, AZ and Daphne-Fairhope-Foley, AL are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.6 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.

Rents creates the largest separation: Daphne-Fairhope-Foley is 9.4 points higher. But services move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.

For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Lake Havasu City-Kingman corresponds to $100,629 in Daphne-Fairhope-Foley.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Lake Havasu City-Kingman
94.1
Daphne-Fairhope-Foley
94.7
Goods
Lake Havasu City-Kingman
96.2
Daphne-Fairhope-Foley
96.4
Services
Lake Havasu City-Kingman
88.7
Daphne-Fairhope-Foley
83.3
Rents
Lake Havasu City-Kingman
79.8
Daphne-Fairhope-Foley
89.2

Vertical line = national average (100)

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Lake Havasu City-Kingman would need to be in Daphne-Fairhope-Foley for the same purchasing power:

In Lake Havasu City-Kingman In Daphne-Fairhope-Foley Difference
$50,000 $50,315 +$315
$75,000 $75,472 +$472
$100,000 $100,629 +$629
$150,000 $150,944 +$944
$ in Lake Havasu City-Kingman = in Daphne-Fairhope-Foley

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (94.1 → 94.7), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Daphne-Fairhope-Foley more expensive than Lake Havasu City-Kingman?

Daphne-Fairhope-Foley is 0.6% more expensive than Lake Havasu City-Kingman. The overall cost index is 94.7 vs 94.1 (national average = 100).

What salary in Daphne-Fairhope-Foley equals $100K in Lake Havasu City-Kingman?

A $100,000 salary in Lake Havasu City-Kingman has the same purchasing power as $100,629 in Daphne-Fairhope-Foley. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Lake Havasu City-Kingman and Daphne-Fairhope-Foley?

Rents in Lake Havasu City-Kingman are indexed at 79.8 while Daphne-Fairhope-Foley is at 89.2 (national average = 100). Daphne-Fairhope-Foley has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.