Overall
Diff +0.6 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Daphne-Fairhope-Foley is 0.6% more expensive than Lake Havasu City-Kingman.
Daphne-Fairhope-Foley, AL is 0.6% more expensive than Lake Havasu City-Kingman, AZ on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 94.7 vs 94.1). A $100,000 salary in Lake Havasu City-Kingman buys about the same as $100,629 in Daphne-Fairhope-Foley; the largest component gap is rents.
RPP parity plate
Pair AZ:AL 94.1→94.7
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Lake Havasu City-Kingman, AZ and Daphne-Fairhope-Foley, AL are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.6 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Rents creates the largest separation: Daphne-Fairhope-Foley is 9.4 points higher. But services move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Lake Havasu City-Kingman corresponds to $100,629 in Daphne-Fairhope-Foley.
Diff +0.6 RPP
Diff +0.2 RPP
Diff -5.4 RPP
Diff +9.4 RPP
| Category | Lake Havasu City-Kingman | Daphne-Fairhope-Foley | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 94.1 | 94.7 | +0.6 |
| Goods | 96.2 | 96.4 | +0.2 |
| Services | 88.7 | 83.3 | -5.4 |
| Rents | 79.8 | 89.2 | +9.4 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Lake Havasu City-Kingman and Daphne-Fairhope-Foley share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap held broadly steady, moving from 1.5 to 0.6 RPP points. Daphne-Fairhope-Foley remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Services changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 5.5 points between the first and latest shared releases (0.0 to 5.4 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Lake Havasu City-Kingman RPP | Daphne-Fairhope-Foley RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 93.8 | 95.3 | 1.5 points Daphne-Fairhope-Foley higher |
| 2012 | 95.5 | 95.9 | 0.3 points Daphne-Fairhope-Foley higher |
| 2016 | 93.0 | 94.8 | 1.9 points Daphne-Fairhope-Foley higher |
| 2020 | 87.7 | 90.8 | 3.1 points Daphne-Fairhope-Foley higher |
| 2024 | 94.1 | 94.7 | 0.6 points Daphne-Fairhope-Foley higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
What a salary in Lake Havasu City-Kingman would need to be in Daphne-Fairhope-Foley for the same purchasing power:
| In Lake Havasu City-Kingman | In Daphne-Fairhope-Foley | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $50,315 | +$315 |
| $75,000 | $75,472 | +$472 |
| $100,000 | $100,629 | +$629 |
| $150,000 | $150,944 | +$944 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (94.1 → 94.7), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Daphne-Fairhope-Foley is 0.6% more expensive than Lake Havasu City-Kingman. The overall cost index is 94.7 vs 94.1 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Lake Havasu City-Kingman has the same purchasing power as $100,629 in Daphne-Fairhope-Foley. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Lake Havasu City-Kingman are indexed at 79.8 while Daphne-Fairhope-Foley is at 89.2 (national average = 100). Daphne-Fairhope-Foley has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.