Overall
- Barnstable Town
- 98.4
Diff +4.3 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Barnstable Town is 4.5% more expensive than Lake Havasu City-Kingman.
Barnstable Town, MA is 4.5% more expensive than Lake Havasu City-Kingman, AZ on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 98.4 vs 94.1). A $100,000 salary in Lake Havasu City-Kingman buys about the same as $104,520 in Barnstable Town; the largest component gap is services.
RPP parity plate
Pair AZ:MA 94.1→98.4
TIER-NEAR · CROSS-STATE · SERVICES-LED · BOTH-BELOW · PP-SHIFT
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
Barnstable Town, MA is 4.5% more expensive than Lake Havasu City-Kingman, AZ, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 4.3-point overall gap.
Services leads the difference, with Barnstable Town 69.7 points higher than Lake Havasu City-Kingman. Goods, services, and rents all point in the same broad direction, making the headline comparison more transferable across household types.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Lake Havasu City-Kingman to $104,520 in Barnstable Town, but it is not a personal spending weight.
Lake Havasu City-Kingman and Barnstable Town share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 9.0 to 4.3 RPP points. Barnstable Town remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Services changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 21.0 points between the first and latest shared releases (48.7 to 69.7 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Lake Havasu City-Kingman RPP | Barnstable Town RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 93.8 | 102.8 | 9.0 points Barnstable Town higher |
| 2012 | 95.5 | 100.9 | 5.4 points Barnstable Town higher |
| 2016 | 93.0 | 105.8 | 12.8 points Barnstable Town higher |
| 2020 | 87.7 | 101.3 | 13.6 points Barnstable Town higher |
| 2024 | 94.1 | 98.4 | 4.3 points Barnstable Town higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
Diff +4.3 RPP
Diff +0.8 RPP
Diff +69.7 RPP
Diff +10.2 RPP
| Category | Lake Havasu City-Kingman | Barnstable Town | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 94.1 | 98.4 | +4.3 |
| Goods | 96.2 | 97.0 | +0.8 |
| Services | 88.7 | 158.4 | +69.7 |
| Rents | 79.8 | 90.0 | +10.2 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
What a salary in Lake Havasu City-Kingman would need to be in Barnstable Town for the same purchasing power:
| In Lake Havasu City-Kingman | In Barnstable Town | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $52,260 | +$2,260 |
| $75,000 | $78,390 | +$3,390 |
| $100,000 | $104,520 | +$4,520 |
| $150,000 | $156,780 | +$6,780 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (94.1 → 98.4), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Barnstable Town is 4.5% more expensive than Lake Havasu City-Kingman. The overall cost index is 98.4 vs 94.1 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Lake Havasu City-Kingman has the same purchasing power as $104,520 in Barnstable Town. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Lake Havasu City-Kingman are indexed at 79.8 while Barnstable Town is at 90.0 (national average = 100). Barnstable Town has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.