Knoxville vs Slidell-Mandeville-Covington

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Slidell-Mandeville-Covington is 0.2% more expensive than Knoxville.

0.2% more expensive

Slidell-Mandeville-Covington, LA is 0.2% more expensive than Knoxville, TN on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 92.7 vs 92.6). A $100,000 salary in Knoxville buys about the same as $100,170 in Slidell-Mandeville-Covington; the largest component gap is rents.

  • Overall RPP 92.6 (Knoxville) vs 92.7 (Slidell-Mandeville-Covington)
  • $100k in Knoxville ≈ $100,170 purchasing power in Slidell-Mandeville-Covington
  • Rents drives the gap (+2.7 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair TN:LA 92.6→92.7

PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR

  • PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
  • CROSS-STATE TN × LA
  • SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
  • BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
  • PP-PAR PP near-par

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

Knoxville
92.6
Cost Index
Slidell-Mandeville-Covington
92.7
Cost Index

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Knoxville, TN and Slidell-Mandeville-Covington, LA are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.2 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.

Rents creates the largest separation: Slidell-Mandeville-Covington is 2.7 points higher. But goods and services move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.

For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Knoxville corresponds to $100,170 in Slidell-Mandeville-Covington.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Knoxville
92.6
Slidell-Mandeville-Covington
92.7
Goods
Knoxville
96.2
Slidell-Mandeville-Covington
93.7
Services
Knoxville
71.9
Slidell-Mandeville-Covington
71.7
Rents
Knoxville
82.8
Slidell-Mandeville-Covington
85.4

Vertical line = national average (100)

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Knoxville would need to be in Slidell-Mandeville-Covington for the same purchasing power:

In Knoxville In Slidell-Mandeville-Covington Difference
$50,000 $50,085 +$85
$75,000 $75,127 +$127
$100,000 $100,170 +$170
$150,000 $150,254 +$254
$ in Knoxville = in Slidell-Mandeville-Covington

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (92.6 → 92.7), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Slidell-Mandeville-Covington more expensive than Knoxville?

Slidell-Mandeville-Covington is 0.2% more expensive than Knoxville. The overall cost index is 92.7 vs 92.6 (national average = 100).

What salary in Slidell-Mandeville-Covington equals $100K in Knoxville?

A $100,000 salary in Knoxville has the same purchasing power as $100,170 in Slidell-Mandeville-Covington. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Knoxville and Slidell-Mandeville-Covington?

Rents in Knoxville are indexed at 82.8 while Slidell-Mandeville-Covington is at 85.4 (national average = 100). Slidell-Mandeville-Covington has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.