Overall
- Kingsport-Bristol
- 86.4
- Waterloo-Cedar Falls
- 87.1
Diff +0.6 RPP
Kingsport-Bristol vs Waterloo-Cedar Falls
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Waterloo-Cedar Falls is 0.7% more expensive than Kingsport-Bristol.
0.7% more expensive
Waterloo-Cedar Falls, IA is 0.7% more expensive than Kingsport-Bristol, TN-VA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 87.1 vs 86.4). A $100,000 salary in Kingsport-Bristol buys about the same as $100,706 in Waterloo-Cedar Falls; the largest component gap is services.
- Overall RPP 86.4 (Kingsport-Bristol) vs 87.1 (Waterloo-Cedar Falls)
- $100k in Kingsport-Bristol ≈ $100,706 purchasing power in Waterloo-Cedar Falls
- Services drives the gap (+7.7 RPP points)
RPP parity plate
Pair TN:IA 86.4→87.1
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR
- PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
- CROSS-STATE TN × IA
- SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
- BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
- PP-PAR PP near-par
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Kingsport-Bristol
86.4
Cost Index
Waterloo-Cedar Falls
87.1
Cost Index
What This Comparison Actually Tells You
Kingsport-Bristol, TN-VA and Waterloo-Cedar Falls, IA are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.6 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Services creates the largest separation: Waterloo-Cedar Falls is 7.7 points higher. But goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Kingsport-Bristol to $100,706 in Waterloo-Cedar Falls, but it is not a personal spending weight.
Category Breakdown
Goods
- Kingsport-Bristol
- 96.2
- Waterloo-Cedar Falls
- 93.7
Diff -2.5 RPP
Services
- Kingsport-Bristol
- 75.9
- Waterloo-Cedar Falls
- 83.7
Diff +7.7 RPP
Rents
- Kingsport-Bristol
- 56.5
- Waterloo-Cedar Falls
- 63.1
Diff +6.6 RPP
| Category | Kingsport-Bristol | Waterloo-Cedar Falls | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 86.4 | 87.1 | +0.6 |
| Goods | 96.2 | 93.7 | -2.5 |
| Services | 75.9 | 83.7 | +7.7 |
| Rents | 56.5 | 63.1 | +6.6 |
Visual Comparison
Overall
Kingsport-Bristol 86.4
Waterloo-Cedar Falls 87.1
Goods
Kingsport-Bristol 96.2
Waterloo-Cedar Falls 93.7
Services
Kingsport-Bristol 75.9
Waterloo-Cedar Falls 83.7
Rents
Kingsport-Bristol 56.5
Waterloo-Cedar Falls 63.1
Vertical line = national average (100)
Salary Equivalents
What a salary in Kingsport-Bristol would need to be in Waterloo-Cedar Falls for the same purchasing power:
| In Kingsport-Bristol | In Waterloo-Cedar Falls | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $50,353 | +$353 |
| $75,000 | $75,529 | +$529 |
| $100,000 | $100,706 | +$706 |
| $150,000 | $151,058 | +$1,058 |
$ in Kingsport-Bristol = in Waterloo-Cedar Falls
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (86.4 → 87.1), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Waterloo-Cedar Falls more expensive than Kingsport-Bristol?
Waterloo-Cedar Falls is 0.7% more expensive than Kingsport-Bristol. The overall cost index is 87.1 vs 86.4 (national average = 100).
What salary in Waterloo-Cedar Falls equals $100K in Kingsport-Bristol?
A $100,000 salary in Kingsport-Bristol has the same purchasing power as $100,706 in Waterloo-Cedar Falls. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
How do rents compare between Kingsport-Bristol and Waterloo-Cedar Falls?
Rents in Kingsport-Bristol are indexed at 56.5 while Waterloo-Cedar Falls is at 63.1 (national average = 100). Waterloo-Cedar Falls has higher rents.
Data sources
- BEA Regional Price Parities (RPP), the cost-of-living indices shown on this page
- U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey (ACS), gross-rent observations behind the rents component
- BLS Consumer Price Index (CPI), goods and services price relatives
- BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS), labor-driven services component
- HUD Fair Market Rents (FMR), 40th-percentile rent cross-reference
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.