Kingsport-Bristol vs Anniston-Oxford

Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Anniston-Oxford is 0.6% less expensive than Kingsport-Bristol.

0.6% less expensive

Anniston-Oxford, AL is 0.6% less expensive than Kingsport-Bristol, TN-VA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 85.9 vs 86.4). A $100,000 salary in Kingsport-Bristol buys about the same as $99,424 in Anniston-Oxford; the largest component gap is services.

  • Overall RPP 86.4 (Kingsport-Bristol) vs 85.9 (Anniston-Oxford)
  • $100k in Kingsport-Bristol ≈ $99,424 purchasing power in Anniston-Oxford
  • Services drives the gap (+11.2 RPP points)

RPP parity plate

Pair TN:AL 86.4→85.9

PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-BELOW · PP-PAR

  • PHOTO-FINISH Photo finish
  • CROSS-STATE TN × AL
  • SPLIT-BUDGET Split budget
  • BOTH-BELOW Both below 100
  • PP-PAR PP near-par

Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.

Kingsport-Bristol
86.4
Cost Index
Anniston-Oxford
85.9
Cost Index

What This Comparison Actually Tells You

Kingsport-Bristol, TN-VA and Anniston-Oxford, AL are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.5 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.

Services creates the largest separation: Anniston-Oxford is 11.2 points higher. But services and goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.

Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.

Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.

For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Kingsport-Bristol to $99,424 in Anniston-Oxford, but it is not a personal spending weight.

Category Breakdown

Visual Comparison

Overall
Kingsport-Bristol
86.4
Anniston-Oxford
85.9
Goods
Kingsport-Bristol
96.2
Anniston-Oxford
96.4
Services
Kingsport-Bristol
75.9
Anniston-Oxford
87.1
Rents
Kingsport-Bristol
56.5
Anniston-Oxford
54.7

Vertical line = national average (100)

Salary Equivalents

What a salary in Kingsport-Bristol would need to be in Anniston-Oxford for the same purchasing power:

In Kingsport-Bristol In Anniston-Oxford Difference
$50,000 $49,712 $-288
$75,000 $74,568 $-432
$100,000 $99,424 $-576
$150,000 $149,136 $-864
$ in Kingsport-Bristol = in Anniston-Oxford

Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (86.4 → 85.9), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Anniston-Oxford more expensive than Kingsport-Bristol?

Anniston-Oxford is 0.6% less expensive than Kingsport-Bristol. The overall cost index is 85.9 vs 86.4 (national average = 100).

What salary in Anniston-Oxford equals $100K in Kingsport-Bristol?

A $100,000 salary in Kingsport-Bristol has the same purchasing power as $99,424 in Anniston-Oxford. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.

How do rents compare between Kingsport-Bristol and Anniston-Oxford?

Rents in Kingsport-Bristol are indexed at 56.5 while Anniston-Oxford is at 54.7 (national average = 100). Kingsport-Bristol has higher rents.

Data sourced from official public datasets, Regional Price Parities (2024), index where national average = 100. Retrieved and formatted by PlainCost. See our methodology for details.

Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.