Overall
- Killeen-Temple
- 91.1
- Lancaster
- 98.3
Diff +7.1 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Lancaster is 7.8% more expensive than Killeen-Temple.
Lancaster, PA is 7.8% more expensive than Killeen-Temple, TX on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 98.3 vs 91.1). A $100,000 salary in Killeen-Temple buys about the same as $107,818 in Lancaster; the largest component gap is services.
RPP parity plate
Pair TX:PA 91.1→98.3
TIER-NEAR · CROSS-STATE · SERVICES-LED · BOTH-BELOW · PP-SHIFT
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Both metros remain below the U.S. benchmark of 100. This comparison chooses between two below-average price levels; “more expensive” here does not mean nationally expensive.
Lancaster, PA is 7.8% more expensive than Killeen-Temple, TX, a meaningful but not extreme shift. The move decision turns on which budget category creates the 7.1-point overall gap.
Services leads the difference, with Lancaster 26.0 points higher than Killeen-Temple. Goods, services, and rents all point in the same broad direction, making the headline comparison more transferable across household types.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Killeen-Temple to $107,818 in Lancaster, but it is not a personal spending weight.
Killeen-Temple and Lancaster share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap widened, moving from 5.7 to 7.1 RPP points. Lancaster remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Services changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 16.8 points between the first and latest shared releases (9.2 to 26.0 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Killeen-Temple RPP | Lancaster RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 94.5 | 100.2 | 5.7 points Lancaster higher |
| 2012 | 94.1 | 97.8 | 3.7 points Lancaster higher |
| 2016 | 95.2 | 99.4 | 4.2 points Lancaster higher |
| 2020 | 91.9 | 97.9 | 6.0 points Lancaster higher |
| 2024 | 91.1 | 98.3 | 7.1 points Lancaster higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
Diff +7.1 RPP
Diff +6.9 RPP
Diff +26.0 RPP
Diff +15.9 RPP
| Category | Killeen-Temple | Lancaster | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 91.1 | 98.3 | +7.1 |
| Goods | 93.8 | 100.7 | +6.9 |
| Services | 81.2 | 107.3 | +26.0 |
| Rents | 77.9 | 93.8 | +15.9 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
What a salary in Killeen-Temple would need to be in Lancaster for the same purchasing power:
| In Killeen-Temple | In Lancaster | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $53,909 | +$3,909 |
| $75,000 | $80,864 | +$5,864 |
| $100,000 | $107,818 | +$7,818 |
| $150,000 | $161,727 | +$11,727 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (91.1 → 98.3), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Lancaster is 7.8% more expensive than Killeen-Temple. The overall cost index is 98.3 vs 91.1 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Killeen-Temple has the same purchasing power as $107,818 in Lancaster. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Killeen-Temple are indexed at 77.9 while Lancaster is at 93.8 (national average = 100). Lancaster has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.