Overall
- Kennewick-Richland
- 100.1
- Flagstaff
- 100.3
Diff +0.2 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Flagstaff is 0.2% more expensive than Kennewick-Richland.
Flagstaff, AZ is 0.2% more expensive than Kennewick-Richland, WA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 100.3 vs 100.1). A $100,000 salary in Kennewick-Richland buys about the same as $100,246 in Flagstaff; the largest component gap is rents.
RPP parity plate
Pair WA:AZ 100.1→100.3
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BOTH-ABOVE · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Kennewick-Richland, WA and Flagstaff, AZ are a photo finish on overall price level, only 0.2 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Rents creates the largest separation: Flagstaff is 14.1 points higher. But goods move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
Both metros exceed the U.S. benchmark of 100. The choice is between two national premiums, so local wages need to clear the higher baseline in either market.
For a housing-sensitive move, validate the rent gap first: HUD Fair Market Rent and the actual unit size can overturn what the blended index implies. On the BEA ratio alone, $100,000 in Kennewick-Richland corresponds to $100,246 in Flagstaff.
Diff +0.2 RPP
Diff -8.8 RPP
Diff +0.3 RPP
Diff +14.1 RPP
| Category | Kennewick-Richland | Flagstaff | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 100.1 | 100.3 | +0.2 |
| Goods | 105.0 | 96.2 | -8.8 |
| Services | 93.6 | 93.8 | +0.3 |
| Rents | 94.8 | 109.0 | +14.1 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
What a salary in Kennewick-Richland would need to be in Flagstaff for the same purchasing power:
| In Kennewick-Richland | In Flagstaff | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $50,123 | +$123 |
| $75,000 | $75,184 | +$184 |
| $100,000 | $100,246 | +$246 |
| $150,000 | $150,369 | +$369 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (100.1 → 100.3), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Flagstaff is 0.2% more expensive than Kennewick-Richland. The overall cost index is 100.3 vs 100.1 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Kennewick-Richland has the same purchasing power as $100,246 in Flagstaff. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Kennewick-Richland are indexed at 94.8 while Flagstaff is at 109.0 (national average = 100). Flagstaff has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.