Overall
- Kennewick-Richland
- 100.1
- Coeur d'Alene
- 98.3
Diff -1.8 RPP
Cost of living comparison based on BEA Regional Price Parities. Coeur d'Alene is 1.8% less expensive than Kennewick-Richland.
Coeur d'Alene, ID is 1.8% less expensive than Kennewick-Richland, WA on BEA Regional Price Parities (overall RPP 98.3 vs 100.1). A $100,000 salary in Kennewick-Richland buys about the same as $98,215 in Coeur d'Alene; the largest component gap is services.
RPP parity plate
Pair WA:ID 100.1→98.3
PHOTO-FINISH · CROSS-STATE · SPLIT-BUDGET · BENCH-CROSS · PP-PAR
Instrument codes from this pair's BEA Regional Price Parities (overall · goods · services · rents · national benchmark 100 · purchasing-power conversion), not a ranking or recommendation.
Kennewick-Richland, WA and Coeur d'Alene, ID are a photo finish on overall price level, only 1.8 RPP points apart. A salary conversion is therefore a fine adjustment, not evidence of a fundamentally different cost regime.
Services creates the largest separation: Coeur d'Alene is 22.8 points lower. But rents move against the overall direction, so this is a split budget rather than a clean across-the-board winner.
Comparable population context is incomplete for this pair, so no market-scale explanation is inferred from the price indexes.
This route crosses the national benchmark: Kennewick-Richland is above 100 while Coeur d'Alene is below it. That makes the move a change of price regime, not merely a rank swap.
For a service-heavy household, test childcare, health, and other locally supplied costs before relying on rent alone. The BEA ratio converts $100,000 in Kennewick-Richland to $98,215 in Coeur d'Alene, but it is not a personal spending weight.
Diff -1.8 RPP
Diff -8.8 RPP
Diff -22.8 RPP
Diff +10.8 RPP
| Category | Kennewick-Richland | Coeur d'Alene | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 100.1 | 98.3 | -1.8 |
| Goods | 105.0 | 96.2 | -8.8 |
| Services | 93.6 | 70.8 | -22.8 |
| Rents | 94.8 | 105.6 | +10.8 |
Vertical line = national average (100)
Kennewick-Richland and Coeur d'Alene share 17 published annual releases from 2008 through 2024. Their overall gap narrowed, moving from 4.0 to 1.8 RPP points. Kennewick-Richland remained the higher-index metro in the latest release.
Goods changed the most within this pair: its gap moved 16.0 points between the first and latest shared releases (7.1 to 8.8 points). This describes a relative price-index history, not a forecast or a household budget.
| Release Year | Kennewick-Richland RPP | Coeur d'Alene RPP | Relative Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 94.2 | 98.1 | 4.0 points Coeur d'Alene higher |
| 2012 | 99.3 | 94.9 | 4.5 points Kennewick-Richland higher |
| 2016 | 97.4 | 97.5 | 0.1 points Coeur d'Alene higher |
| 2020 | 99.8 | 93.0 | 6.7 points Kennewick-Richland higher |
| 2024 | 100.1 | 98.3 | 1.8 points Kennewick-Richland higher |
Annual BEA Regional Price Parity releases; a higher index means a higher price level relative to the national average of 100. Selected years shown from the full shared series.
What a salary in Kennewick-Richland would need to be in Coeur d'Alene for the same purchasing power:
| In Kennewick-Richland | In Coeur d'Alene | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $49,108 | $-892 |
| $75,000 | $73,662 | $-1,338 |
| $100,000 | $98,215 | $-1,785 |
| $150,000 | $147,323 | $-2,677 |
Same BEA Regional Price Parity ratio as the table above (100.1 → 98.3), computed live from your number, nothing is sent anywhere.
Coeur d'Alene is 1.8% less expensive than Kennewick-Richland. The overall cost index is 98.3 vs 100.1 (national average = 100).
A $100,000 salary in Kennewick-Richland has the same purchasing power as $98,215 in Coeur d'Alene. This is based on the BEA Regional Price Parity indexes.
Rents in Kennewick-Richland are indexed at 94.8 while Coeur d'Alene is at 105.6 (national average = 100). Coeur d'Alene has higher rents.
Every figure on PlainCost is rendered directly from BEA Regional Price Parity source data, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, our changelog, or report a data error. Data current as of 2026-08-11. Rankings measure the published cost-of-living index only; we don't recommend where to live or rate any metro's quality of life.